Talk:Brambletye School

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.brambletye.co.uk/history. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was a redirect

I reverted the redirect and added references to the article such that it now conforms to the minimum standards for notability. More work is required. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:23, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for working on this article. It looks like it has the potential to develop into a useful encyclopaedic article. I will have a look for some more sources when I have some more time. Dahliarose (talk) 12:27, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The main thing is that we have proved that it has the potential for references to be found by my finding some. These will not be the sum total of the WP:RS references, nor will these be the total of notable alumni. I may get the time to start to create an articl eon the redlinked alumnus at some point, though it's easy for anyone to create. Folk seem to have polarised views about redlinked folk. Mine is that, in the main, they provide cues for others to create articles. Perhaps someone will beat me to it. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:25, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]