Talk:Brady Campaign
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brady Campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Brady Campaign:
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Brady Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111005120604/http://www.bradycenter.org/about/bio/additional to http://www.bradycenter.org/about/bio/additional
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Critics said
[edit]Critics said that so-called "plastic" handguns contain many metal components (such as the slide, barrel and ammunition), and can be detected by conventional screening technologies. Their response was to say the type of polymer used in the firearms is opaque to X-ray scanners, which would've hidden the metal components.[1]
Here's the closest text in the source and it ain't the same at all:p.425
At the end of 1987 Senator Howard Metzenbaum introduced a bill banning pistols that contained less than 8.5 ounces of steel, ensuring no guns could pass through metal detectors.104 Major gun control groups like Josh Sugarmann and the National Coalition to Ban Handguns supported the bill, claiming that, while the Glock 17 was not invisible to metal detectors, “[t]he technology for developing a 100 percent plastic gun is around the corner.”105 Handgun Control Inc. echoed this position, saying, “everyone agrees the technology is here or around the corner and Congress has the unique opportunity to take preventative measures[, u]ntil we have the safeguards to detect non-metallic handguns, we have to ban them from the marketplace.”106 Not surprisingly, the ban on pistols containing less than 8.5 ounces of steel was strongly opposed by the NRA and other gun advocacy groups.107
I don't see any criticism of the Brady Campaign. Unless someone can point it out I'm gonna delete this crap. Maybe replace it with their accurate prediction of 3D printed guns. Felsic2 (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Ruhl, Jesse Matthew; Rizer, Arthur L. III; Wier, Mikel J. (2004). "Gun Control: Targeting Rationality in a Loaded Debate". The Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy. 13: 424–426. Retrieved February 9, 2014."Plastic Pistols"
One critic says
[edit]One critic says that the groups was pleased that the public confused semi-automatic rifles with machines guns as it made banning the former easier.[1][2]
There ain't nothing in the NSSF press release about this group. I'm deleting the citation and naming the critic. Felsic2 (talk) 17:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Morgan, Eric C. (1990). "Assault Rifle Legislation: Unwise and Unconstitutional". American Journal of Criminal Law (Texas). 17 (143). Archived from the original on July 27, 2011. Retrieved December 8, 2011.
- ^ "Semi-Automatic Rifle Ban Would Reduce Jobs, Not Crime" (Press release). National Shooting Sports Foundation. PR Newswire. February 26, 2009. Retrieved December 11, 2008.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Brady Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/gunsandmothers/debate2.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005120604/http://www.bradycenter.org/about/bio/additional to http://www.bradycenter.org/about/bio/additional
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/244
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://blog.bradycampaign.org/?p=693
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Membership?
[edit]How many dues-paying members does the Brady Campaign actually have? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.80.149 (talk) 15:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- C-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class gun politics articles
- Low-importance gun politics articles
- Gun politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists