Talk:Brachychiton populneus

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Brachychiton populneus is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Correct common name: Kurrajong

I was surprised to see the common name as "Lacebark Kurrajong" in this article. In Australia, all the botanical references I know list Brachychiton populneus simply as "Kurrajong", and maybe additionally as "Black Kurrajong" or "Forest Kurrajong" (reference: Rainforest Trees of Mainland South eastern Australia, A.Floyd, 1989). Calling B.populneus "Lacebark Kurrajong" is certainly a misnomer. B.discolor is also called "Lace Bark Tree" or "Lace Kurrajong", and I think there has been some confusion over common names between the two species of Brachychiton, so I'm proceeding with correcting the common name in the article. Please let me know if anyone is unhappy with this, and I'll provide a list of extensive references to support the correction to the common name.

Also, I've never heard of B.populneus referred to as a "Bottle Tree" in Australia. In Australia, Bottle Tree is usually specific to B.rupestris, but I'll leave changes on that for now, but will come back and change that if it's not substantiated by a reputable Australian botanical reference. User John Moss, 29.6.07.

Just going through the links at the bottom of the article, it appears that it's an overseas horticultural misnomer - including "bottle tree". How do we handle this in Wikipedia? Do we go with the correct use of name in Australia (country of origin), including the standard name in academic use, or misnomers and misinformation OS - even if the misnomers are popularized? Personally I favour the correct name usage from the country of origin, especially where the name is also academically used, but maybe we point out the misnomer OS. user John Moss, 29.6.07.

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sterculia diversifolia

This [1906](http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks09/0900091h.html) book quotes: "The best bark for this purpose was that of the currajong tree (Sterculia diversifolia)."

Is this an archaic name for the kurrajong tree, or a mistake, or what?J1812 (talk) 16:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brachychiton populneus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]