Jump to content

Talk:BoyNextDoor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Japanese single album

[edit]

The term "single album" don't exist outside of the South Korean music industry. The Japanese market only recognises singles and albums (including mini-albums). And, or "Good Day", should instead be categorized as a maxi single, which refers to a single with multiple tracks. I've edited the page to reflect this, as well as having moved the single's main page from And (BoyNextDoor single album) to Good Day (BoyNextDoor song). George13lol2 (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also looked at the two cited sources and both refer to And as a single, not a single album. George13lol2 (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 October 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. After a lengthy listing, opinions are split between those who favour the move and those who oppose it, with a lack of clear evidence that either the proposed name or the current name is more prevalent. Hence there isn't a consensus to move at this time.  — Amakuru (talk) 16:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BoyNextDoor → Boynextdoor – Similar case to our previous discussion over at Talk:Babymonster#Requested move 10 October 2024, I'm proposing eliminating the CamelCase in the article title.

As usual, the most common way the name is presented in RS is in the all-caps stylization, which doesn't help us here. I've clicked through about sixty pages of search results to pull together every instance I could find of reliable sources presenting the group's name without all caps:

Reliable English-language sources for Boynextdoor:

Reliable English-language sources for "BoyNextDoor":

There are some sources that use "Boy Next Door" but those are outliers and Maeil Business Newspaper tends to use "Boynext Door" for whatever reason. Hybe and KOZ both refer to the group in all-caps almost exclusively so they're of no help.

MOS:CAMELCASE defers to whatever appears to be most common; based on what I've found in English-language RS, "Boynextdoor" is the most common, and Wikipedia has a general attitude of avoiding unnecessary capitzalization per MOS:CAPS. RachelTensions (talk) 06:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 18:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That would explain why they refer to the group in three different styles within one article. RachelTensions (talk) 09:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom's survey of independent reliable sources showing a majority with lowercase, along with the recent outcome at Talk:Babymonster#Requested move 10 October 2024 and Wikipedia's general tilt toward lowercase per MOS:CAPS's opening sentence: "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization." —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:51, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Dicklyon (talk) 21:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per MOS:TMRULES and noms survey. Cinderella157 (talk) 09:09, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support-ish. Given that this is kind of a transliteration, a de-marketing-stylization of something presented in allcaps (in English) for aggrandizement purposes, and which (in transliterated Korean) is usually given only with a leading capital B, an argument can be made to do this. But it comes at the expense (albeit a slight one) of the result being harder to read and parse. I don't see that we really gain anything by it at all, but I suppose it's faintly more consistent with some previous odd cases like this.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  23:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I didn't make it through 60 Google search pages, but my finding is that usage is split. Actually, the overwhelming majority of English language sources I found use all-caps BOYNEXTDOOR. I was surprise to see BOYNEXTDOOR in sources like People[1], Rolling Stone[2], Teen Vogue[3][4] and USA Today.[5] These are general audience publications that cover a wide range of entertainers. Yahoo! Entertainment, another general audience pub, used all caps initially and then BoyNextDoor.[6] Many sources are split. The nom notably references Korea JoongAng Daily for both stylings (Boynextdoor and BoyNextDoor). My Google search turned up multiple Korea JoongAng Daily articles using BoyNextDoor[7][8] and when you search their site[9] BoyNextDoor is the predominant result. The nom lists The Korea Times as using Boynextdoor but they also use all caps here[10][11]. I am in no way suggesting all caps. Since usage is variable among sources that don't use all caps, I don't see that this clears the bar for a name change. I concur with @SMcCandlish that BoyNextDoor improves readability and little is gained from the proposed change. That would be less salient if widespread usage were more consistent, but given the variability, it is a worthwhile consideration to keep the article title as-is.--MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 01:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So you're suggesting not using all caps (which is obviously the most common usage, but would obviously go against guidelines), but are instead supporting maintaining the camelcase (which is a the third most common usage by a fairly large margin, per the survey of English-language sources, and goes against the guidelines at WP:CAMELCASE)... can you clarify? RachelTensions (talk) 02:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Happy to clarify. I do not agree that there is a fairly large margin and I disagree that this goes against guidelines or policy. MOS:CAMELCASE states: Trademarks in "CamelCase" are a judgment call; the style may be used where it reflects general usage and makes the trademark more readable. I did not find an overwhelming difference in BoyNextDoor vs. Boynextdoor. I do find that BoyNextDoor improves readability. Your bulleted lists appear to show a 10:4 difference, but that's when you throw out something like 90% of references that use an unallowable all caps style, the outliers like Boy Next Door, and the fact that many of the same sources are not consistent from article to article and sometimes not within the same article. Per WP:TITLECHANGES: If an article title has been stable for a long time, and there is no good reason to change it, it should not be changed. Consensus among editors determines if there does exist a good reason to change the title. I appreciate that you and I disagree on whether there is a good reason to change this article title and that you are seeking consensus. My assessment is that there is no clear usage preference or pattern between the two proposed styles. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 03:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Korea and WikiProject Pop music have been notified of this discussion. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 18:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:BoyNextDoor&oldid=1255779639"