Talk:Botrypus
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Genera
[edit]What genus is this even in? I'm relatively new to wikipedia and I'm not really sure what database or reference is used in a taxonomic clash. I'm keeping the genus as its been listed as botrypus and have added that to the family page and removed the redirrect to from botrypus to botrychium. If I am wrong feel free to undo those edits. Wasp32 (talk) 01:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Botrypus virginianus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120316125324/http://ethnoleaflets.com/leaflets/pterido.htm to http://ethnoleaflets.com/leaflets/pterido.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Genus name/article title conflict
[edit]I'm reading the article and it refers to the genus Botrypus and the species Botrychium virginianum. This is like looking at an article about someone named Sarah Johnson and then, with no further context, seeing her referred to by the surname Blake throughout the article.
There is only one genus name. There may be synonyms when a plant is named and then renamed, but one should be the superior or correct synonym over the other, and be used throughout the article. The other name should be clearly labeled a synonym, and not used to refer to the plant in the article text.
This is an issue. This article is the top search result for "Botrychium virginianum" for me, and likely countless others. Please resolve. 2604:2D80:E594:3800:9029:94D4:187D:B7FD (talk) 23:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- I have corrected the first sentence. As the Taxonomy and genetics section explains, recent research suggests that the species formerly known as Botrychium virginianum is best place in a genus of its own, so it's now the only species in the genus Botrypus. Not all sources have yet caught up. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)