Jump to content

Talk:Boscobel (mansion)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Boscobel"

[edit]

In the first decade of the 1800s, in an Anglo-American context "Boscobel" has two complementary (mutually compatible) connotations, now both mentioned in the article. Let's not delete information that bores us. It's not donme with the Wikipedia reader in mind. --Wetman (talk) 06:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Perhaps" has no place in an encyclopedia, except when some other cited source is quoted or clearly attributed. It's speculation, which we don't do. Nothing in either the NRHP nom nor Boscobel's website gives any clue. If you want to put it in, find a source. It may well be true, but without a source on it we're best leaving it out. Daniel Case (talk) 06:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I found a New York Times article we can use. Was it that hard to look for a source? Daniel Case (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The debated deleted sentence ran as follows: "Dyckman intended to build an estate on 250 acres (1 km²) near Montrose and name it Boscobel, perhaps after Boscobel House in Shropshire, perhaps for the Italianate charm of Bosco Bello, "pretty woodland". The wise reader of Wikipedia always reads the related Talkpage. The idea that in the first decade of the nineteenth century, a "conspicuously well-fixed farmer, surrounded with objects of taste" could possibly be as ignorant of the Italian meaning of Boscobel as— to pick a contemporary comparison at random— as some semi-literate product of a twentieth-century American high school might well be, is certainly an idea that needs to be documented. --Wetman (talk) 07:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Boscobel (Garrison, New York). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]