Talk:Boronia foetida

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Boronia foetida is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Range map

The range map at Boronia foetida DistMap46.png should not be used. See the note in the file description. (3 of the 29 records shown (and possibly more) BRI AQ0850480, BRI AQ0258165, and BRI AQ0539449 are recorded in AVH as "coordinate precision not valid".) The three points near Maryborough that I checked belonged to a large set collected by Marco Duretto and presumably given an invalid coordinate precision because of the rarity of the species.... (I had downloaded this field, but not thought it worth checking nor had I thought to not use the data involved, but here with essentially two GPS points (29 specimens), this failure is critical.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]