Talk:Bonkers (American TV series)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Lucky & Miranda

Did the two ever have a crossover? --Plainnym 15:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I respond to old comments; apologies if that bothers people. Lucky and Miranda were both in the episode that had Miranda replacing Lucky at the end; other than that, I do not know. -BaronGrackle 20:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Miranda appears in the Hear No Bonkers, See No Bonkers episode also--88.196.176.156 (talk) 17:47, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unintentional Irony

In Episode 48/Season 3 "Seems Like Old Toons" Bonkers , Marilyn Piquel and friends save an old-fashioned animation studio (i.e Cartoons drawn by hand}. AN irony of this is that years later Disney switched from hand-drawn animation to computer animation.

Change in tone

THe First season was goofy Bonkers and Comic relief Lucky Piquel. By the second season Bonkers was the Comic Relief to "straight man"{!} Miranda Wright.

Split

I disagree with the need for a split. This article is already lacking in detail. Unless there are enough real world, WP:verifiable sources to support an article for the character, no need to split. AnmaFinotera 02:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the split. I would also suggest that there will be another article split, this time, for Fall-Apart Rabbit. (P.S.: I'm also a fan of the show.)

~~LDEJRuff~~ (talk) 19:55, 3 December 2007 (EDT)

Lucky Piquel

"...possibly drawn as a caricature of Dennis Franz. For those who've seen "Roger Rabbit" (which the show is clearly based on), he echoes Eddie Valiant."

This is all wild speculation. And point of view. Sentences that start with 'For those who've seen' really do not belong on Wikipedia. 'Possibly' isn't good enough, either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.41.3 (talk) 01:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why does Lucky not have an article?

Miranda does. Lucky was at least as of equal importance to the show as she was. Maybe even more so, since he appeared in alot more episodes than she did. Either Lucky, and maybe Bonkers, should be given their own, seperate articles, or Miranda's should be deleted. There are no reasons that warrant Miranda having an article to herself, but not Lucky or Bonkers.

Roger Rabbit & more

The article needs links to prove all of the claims this article makes. Especially when it comes to Who Framed Roger Rabbit and the show's production. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.163.105 (talk) 00:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.

Majinsnake (talk) 13:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Theme song

Does anyone know who performed the show's theme song. 172.56.16.162 (talk) 18:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the years since this question, someone added "Bonkers Theme performed by
Rob Paulsen
Randy Petersen
Kevin Quinn
John Bauman
Kasey Cisyk". On Jim Cummings' new podcast, he questions Paulsen being in the segment, and the statement has no source anyway. -- Zanimum (talk) 12:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bonkers (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs serious work

Sloppy, and a lot of the info is unsourced Dpm12 (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

The episode grouping used in this article is inappropriate. You must immediately put all the 19 Miranda episodes in one group, between the first Lucky group and the last Lucky group. The extra compilation episodes should remain listed separately. 79.106.124.235 (talk) 14:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that to. Someone should recreate the diagram of the groups where the first should be the first Lucky group, the second should be the Miranda group and the third should be the second Lucky group. 188.172.111.27 (talk) 14:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonkers episodes

The way these episodes are listed is wrong. There must be only three group in which the first one contains the first Lucky episodes, the second one contains "New Partners on the Block" with the Miranda episodes and the third one contains the last Lucky episodes. DenisBendaj08 (talk) 15:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The extra compilations can be listed separately. DenisBendaj08 (talk) 15:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Genre of the tv show

i only watch of 4 episodes of this animaeted series on also i think it could be slapstick too Kuyalanz (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]