Talk:Bombax ceiba
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]Another Chinese name is Panzhihua (Chinese: 攀枝花; pinyin: Pānzhīhūa; Wade-Giles: P'an-chih-hua), for which the city of Panzhihua (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzhihua) in Sichuan Province is named. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Palmarum (talk • contribs) 19:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bombax ceiba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130325121024/http://www.chiangraitimes.com/news/2579.html to http://www.chiangraitimes.com/news/2579.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Common names
[edit]The "Common names" section is not appropriate for an article in the English Wikipedia. It is almost completely unsourced, and adds no value to an encyclopedia article. The multiple links to articles about Bombax ceiba in other language Wikipedias listed in the Languages box are sufficient for readers wanting to know what the plant is called in other languages. I therefore propose to remove the "Common names" section. - Donald Albury 12:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)