This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
A fact from Boloco appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 November 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that there are only two locations left of Boloco, which once had 22 burrito restaurants throughout the northeastern United States?
I decided to remove the specific menu items. The intro adequately addresses what kind of restaurant chain this is and what food is served, specifically listing what is on the menu is redundant and reads like advertising... plus menus will change all the time and there likely won't be an independant source reporting this every time it happens. Let me know if you disagree with my analysis. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs18:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article appears to have been nominated in time after passing the GAN. Well-sourced, and everything looks good eligibility-wise. QPQ done. Not sure about ALT2 when it comes to interestingness. I prefer ALT1 over ALT0 since the "uncertain future" might be a subjective thing. No issues with ALT1.--NØ15:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]