Jump to content

Talk:Bo Burnham: Inside/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Infobox looks good (but I think Josh Senior might need a source).
  • "about his day-to-day life indoors [...] taking photos for Instagram" (was that song about him?)
    • Yeah, now I tried to word this so it didn't imply that he was the one doing the "activities on the internet", but I can see how that's not come across. How does the reworded first paragraph look? — Bilorv (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the second lead paragraph, add a WP:DATECOMMA after May 30, 2021.
  • Serial comma after "stand-up comedy".

Background

[edit]
  • "Burnham begun to have" → "Burnham began to have"
  • Make a WP:CITEBUNDLE with the four sources after "Make Happy (2016)"
  • Link panic attacks in #Background and remove the link in #Synopsis.
  • "in [his] guest house, in his home in Los Angeles" sounds like two places. Reword.
    • Is it better as filmed in Burnham's guest house, inside his Los Angeles home? — Bilorv (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis and album

[edit]
  • This section is 693 words so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
  • The second sentence repeats "the special" twice. Reword to avoid wordiness.
  • Remove the comma after "he does not want to finish the special".
  • #Album looks good but the track listing needs a source.

Analysis

[edit]
  • "analysed" → "analyzed" (American English for all uses)
  • "and the subsequent reaction video is" → "and the subsequent reaction video are"
    • Do you think it's okay as The song "Unpaid Intern" and subsequent reaction video is... (no second "the", so only one article)? It's not that they're both similar to Mr. Show individually, but collectively. — Bilorv (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that works. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception and references

[edit]

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
Thanks for the review! Very speedy. I've implemented all of these, or at least made a first attempt, and replied with comments to a few as well. — Bilorv (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]