Talk:Bože pravde/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Bože pravde. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Untitled
Copyrighted text on this page used with permission.
The link to the mp3 file is dead (indeed, the whole website it was on is now empty). -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 12:33, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
As of now, the link is still broken, and the home domain just leads to an FTP directory, with the cgi-bin folder. Yurfxrendenmein 15:45, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Why is the media box in the top right displaying ("জাতীয় সংগীত" presumably "National Anthem", "কথা" presumably author, and "সুর" presumably composer) in Assamese language on this, the English page? JohnGH (talk) 11:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- That is vandalism in the Infobox Anthem template. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Uneven page
Don't you guys think the page is in a mess? __earth 17:36, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)
- made some facial change to adhere to general wikipedia format __earth 17:52, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)
The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina
The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina on 17 and 18 November 2006
- Noirceuil, what's the problem? If an article of the Law is found unconstitutional, it means that the anthem is not according to the constitution, ergo it's not (or will not be in near future) an anthem. It doesn't mean that the song would be banned. Here's a summary [1] which states that:
- As a result, FBiH does not have a flag or coat of arms, while RS does not have an anthem or coat of arms.
- I fail to see how your removal of the sourced text helps any clarification. And, your edit summary:
- The Articles... are unconstitutional not the hymn per se. Read the Text of the Court you linked!
- looks like rules lawyering, sorry: you're trying to say that invalidation of the law on anthem does not invalidate the anthem itself??? Duja► 09:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
The constitutional court of BiH declared the anthem illegal and everyone who writes Boze Pravde as RS anthem is using vandalism. Visca el barca 08:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
English version
- Is done quite well, changing some words (but never going outside context) in oder to make it rhyme has actually made possible for someone who doesn't understand Serbian to grasp true meaning of the song. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.198.195 (talk) 22:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Origins of Boze Pravde
I have no precise information about this, so I am reluctant to add anything to the text, but I know for a fact that it is based on Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser but no information of this origin of the Serbian anthem can be found on this page or the one about the Austrian monarchic anthem (though it lists other usage as an anthem) 85.40.209.178 (talk) 23:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm. The similarity is stunning indeed, but I cannot find any reliable source linking the two. No such user (talk) 07:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bože pravde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130616134133/http://www.srbija.gov.rs/cinjenice_o_srbiji/ustav_odredbe.php?id=217 to http://www.srbija.gov.rs/cinjenice_o_srbiji/ustav_odredbe.php?id=217
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bože pravde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091219072218/http://www.parlament.gov.rs/content/lat/akta/akta_detalji.asp?Id=549&t=Z to http://www.parlament.gov.rs/content/lat/akta/akta_detalji.asp?Id=549&t=Z
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140103184526/http://www.ustavnisud.ba/eng/press/index.php?pid=1381&sta=3&pkat=507 to http://www.ustavnisud.ba/eng/press/index.php?pid=1381&sta=3&pkat=507
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)