Talk:Blytt–Sernander system
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]Blytt-Sernander classification or Blytt-Sernander sequence, but not "Blytt-Sernander", an adjectival form that is jargon left by itself. Someone knowledgable in this field can move this article to its most common designation in the literature. (Not being a product of the U.S. public high schools, I do not look Deep Within Myself for the answer.)--Wetman 02:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)--Wetman 02:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Removed much of the section on calibration. It contained errors (e.g. confusing use of "absorption") and is not very relevant for this page. For radiocarbon and calibration, readers can go to other pages. drieteenmeeuw, 10:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Environment articles
- Unknown-importance Environment articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Climate change articles
- Low-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles
- C-Class Time articles
- Low-importance Time articles
- C-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles