Talk:Blunderbuss

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Archives

Archive 1

Grapeshot

could grapeshot have been used in a blunderbuss? --74.178.227.18 (talk) 20:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

teeth

It's widely documented that just about anything as ammunition could be used in blunderbuss guns, including teeth.

Spelling

Resolved

There is a quote "hit a haybrick at 80 yards" which I suspect should read "hit a hayrick at 80 yards" - can anybody verify please? --Redrose64 (talk) 23:11, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see an editor has now amended. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Popular Culture

It pains me to have to remove so much from an article, but we can't have a whole section of unsourced trivia. If anyone wants to add something back, please refer to WP:GUNS before doing so. Grimwol (talk) 13:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blunderbuss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201113306/http://www.nmm.ac.uk/collections/explore/object.cfm?ID=AAA2517 to http://www.nmm.ac.uk/collections/explore/object.cfm?ID=AAA2517

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1609 blunderbuss Lewis and Clark Expedition

It is misleading to say a 1609 blunderbus is of the type used on the Lewis and Clark Expedition because the expedition predates 1809 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:1101:8A40:9DCF:5D03:12D4:1A81 (talk) 03:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]