Talk:Bleak Expectations

Radio: UK Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Infobox width

Is there any reason why the infobox is so wide? Bob talk 01:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look too wide to me. It's less than a quarter of the text area (on my 1280x1024 screen) I wouldn't want it any narrower. -- EdJogg (talk) 08:59, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bleak Expectations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140522103833/http://www.radioacademyawards.org/winners/2010/production-awards/best-comedy/ to http://www.radioacademyawards.org/winners/2010/production-awards/best-comedy/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wives

Article mentions Flora is Pip's first wife and Ripely is his third, but doesn't mention his second. I assume this is counting the brief "marriage" to Gently Benevolent. Should this be added to the Benevolent character summary? Perhaps after the current mention of transparent disguises which Pip never sees through (e.g. "(for instance, Gently dresses as an unconvincing woman and marries the oblivious Pip, becoming - briefly - Pip's second wife)." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.90.249 (talk) 09:55, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional role of Geoffrey Whitehead that could be included

Please correct me if I'm wrong, I believe that in one episode, Geoffrey Whitehead plays the role of a one-off ally to Benevolent with the surname "Harshsmacker". I cannot recall the first name, episode or context about this character, although I feel sure I remember his appearance in the programme. No other members of this family are featured afterwards. When I am able to find and listen to the episode to provide more information regarding this suggestion, I may update this.

I am new to editing and this is the first talk section I've added to a page, please let me know if you agree or disagree about whether this is worth including. --I am sorry please don't block me (talk) 11:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]