Talk:Blackadder Goes Forth

Series or season?

Is this a season of a tv show or it's own series altogether?Joeyramoney 21:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

It's a series. We don't really do seasons here in the UK (although there are doubtless some exceptions, not that I can actually think of any). Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 22:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, I guess technically it is classed as a "season", although it would be perhaps more accurate to describe it as a sequel. Unlike most sitcoms, each series of Blackadder is almost entirely different, with a new situation in a different time period, all-new characters, etc. Most sources (BBC, IMDb, etc) classify it as a completely different series. The characters of Blackadder and Baldrick are the only true constants, and their personalities are also noticably different in each version. Bob talk 22:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

A bit of both. How do you draw the line? -- ALoan (Talk) 22:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I guess series, since that's how it's reffered to in British English, and as a British tv show I think we should use British English in it. Some sort of comparison may be in order, however - but how to avoid violating WP:OR? Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 22:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

(Sorry about that - blasted silent edit conflicts.) -- ALoan (Talk) 22:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

(It's OK, I thought I was the only one to get annoyed by that :-) Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 22:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Captain Darling

I'm not sure where IMDb got their information from about the invention of Darling's name, but the extras in the Blackadder DVD box set has Richard Curtis saying that although Stephen Fry came up with the name, the boy with the same surname was actually at school with Curtis, not Fry. Just a small point.

Good Article Review

This is a very well done aricle and there are only two minor points that need to be adressed to allow this to qualify for Good Article status

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

This is a very well done aricle and there are only two minor points that need to be adressed to allow this to qualify for Good Article status. I will place on hold until the two issues of concern are addressed:

1. Criteria 2a - There are some good references, but there is much in the article desribing incidents from the series and this should have reference(s). This could be a corectly formatted reference to the series itself and/or a book of the scripts. These would be primary sources as per WP:RS#Reliable_sources but these sources are perfectly valid when used in conjuction with other sources, such as are already in the article.
2. Criteria 6c - This is a minor but essential issue. For all images used you must have fair use rationale for this particular article on the image page and hidden text refering to this information in the article nezt to the image.

My other suggestions for improvement (not required to achieve good article status, but would be useful/required if seekign featured article status in the future):

• More references and inline citations.
• Listing of DVD/Video releases in different markets.
• As there is only six episodes in the series a listing of them in the prose (not list) form in the "Episodes" secition would be appropriate. Keep other info in main article.

-Waza 11:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the review - hopefully I've addressed your concerns. I've added citations to the episodes on the BBC DVDs, as hopefully these are a suitable source - I'm afraid I don't have a scriptbook, but if somebody else does and can add some more specific references, that would be excellent. I agree with your later suggestions as well - certainly a few more inline citations would be useful. I've added a prose list of episodes, although I'm not sure whether I'm correct in linking the puns they are based on (as this might just be my interpretation), or whether it would be more useful just to link the episodes. Bob talk 14:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• Criteria 2a (References) - This has been addressed sufficient to the level of good article. I still have some ideas for improvement to featured article level based on the model of main Blackadder article, and I do own a copy of the script book. However I am concerned about the ethics of having the good article review editing the article so do not want todo any edits myself until after the good article nomination is completed.
• Criteria 6c (fair use rationale) - This has not been addressed As I said before this is somewhat pedantic but is required. In fact the images could be deleted from Wikipedia if this is not done. As per the fair use rationale:

Justification should be done in two places. First, add the following hidden text in the article:

<!-- FAIR USE of IMAGENAME.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:IMAGENAME.jpg for rationale -->

Second, add a detailed fair use rationale to the image description page in addition to the fair use tag. This is required.

-Waza 22:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments - I've added the hidden fairuse text to the article, although I had already added fair-use rationales specific to this article to the images (unless I'm missing something). Bob talk 00:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Good Article passed. I will admit while I checked both the first time, when I reviewed again I checked hidden test first and did not look at the images when there was nothing there refering to them. I have update full template to fully passed. - Waza 04:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Last dialogue

Does somebody know why in the last dialogue of "Goodbyeee" Baldrick remarks "Ooh, that's a nasty splinter on that ladder, sir! A bloke could hurt himself on that!"? It seems completely pointless as any of the characters seem to listen or care about it. Does it have a meaning? --Midasminus 16:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Isn't it just a joke that he's concerned that somebody might hurt themselves on something trivial, when they're about to go over to certain death? Bob talk 19:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

I think the inference may be that Baldrick's last, unspoken, cunning plan to get out of going over the top was something to do with sustaining a trivial injury on the splinter? Jellyman (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

"a sunny poppy field and the sound of birdsong. The fate of the four is left ambiguous" Ambiguous? Only in the most literal sense that we don't see them die; poppies seem a pretty obvious reference to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Flanders_Fields — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.122.249.1 (talk) 17:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

GA Sweeps (on hold)

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. Although it is generally up to standard, there are a few minor issues that may need addressing before Blackadder Goes Forth is confirmed as a Good Article. I have listed these below:

• Lead: this should be expanded to meet the criteria at WP:LEAD. Specifically, an article lead is intended to be a summary of the article rather than an introduction to it, and should mention every major point covered by the rest of the article. I would recommend perhaps a sentence or two per section. Also, there is no real requirement for references in the lead, as those points should ideally be referenced in the relevant section underneath where they are dealt with in more detail.
• References: there are one or two paragraphs that are currently unreferenced and could do with citations, but I think generally this is good. However, the quotation at the end of the Plot section definitely needs citing.
• Templates: we recommend using the templates on WP:CITET to format references.

I also fixed a few things as I was going through - for future reference (and in case I missed any!):

• The Manual of Style recommends not using decorative quotations in articles, as they are intended only for call-outs. The blockquote markup is more appropriate. Also, when blockquote is used there is no need for quotation marks (it's either one style or the other).
• emdashes are unspaced if used, and...
• so are in-line citations.

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards, EyeSerene^TALK 11:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

GA sweep (pass)

Thank you for addressing the points above; I have now passed this reassessment (apologies for the delay - busy time of year!). The article history has been updated to reflect this review. All the best, EyeSerene^TALK 21:04, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Overhall

I'm currently in the process of giving the article a large overhall in terms of referencing, adding and improving sections and getting rid of extraneous elements. If anyone is willing to help, particularly by adding references to reliable sources or improving sections such as Production, that would be excellent. I'm also hoping somebody might be able to find some contemporary newspaper opinions for the 'reception' section. Bob talk 01:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

@Bob Castle overhaul. 90.249.6.186 (talk) 08:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Casting

Can anybody think of a good way of saying Atkinson and Robinson reprised their roles as Blackadder and Baldrick, while also making it clear that the characters are sortof different? Bob talk 13:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

"a sunny poppy field and the sound of birdsong. The fate of the four is left ambiguous" Ambiguous? Only in the most literal sense that we don't see them die; poppies seem a pretty obvious reference to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Flanders_Fields — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.122.249.1 (talk) 17:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Nicam Stereo

Today, 31.205.19.241 added "This series of Blackadder was one of the first television programmes in Britain to be made and transmitted with stereo sound, using the NICAM digital system, even though most viewers could only afford, or were only able to receive due to their location, the standard FM mono audio carrier signal."

Which I guess is quite interesting, but uncited, so I've had to remove it. Are there any sources which can confirm that this is the case? I seem to vaguely remember that when the BBC repeat them there is still a little "Dolby" thing at the start of the opening titles, but the DVD copies don't seem to have it. Bob talk 00:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Blackadder Goes Forth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080216215555/http://www.bafta.org:80/awards/television/nominations/?year=1989 to http://www.bafta.org/awards/television/nominations/?year=1989

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blackadder Goes Forth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608083158/http://www.blackadderhall.com/blog/?p=61 to http://www.blackadderhall.com/blog/?p=61

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blackadder Goes Forth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205022625/http://www.howardgoodall.co.uk/tvthemes/tv.htm to http://www.howardgoodall.co.uk/tvthemes/tv.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Season 4 epidisode 2 audio edits

There are appears to be a post-filming edit to the name of a lawyer - Massingbird or mattingbird or mattingburg. It's not clear on several sources. Was this a reduction in the distasteful racism of the time or ... does anyone have any information as to this post-filming edit? Usually the final filming appears to use the actual audio of produced therein. Any documented reasoning? Mine is purely speculation above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.52.200 (talk) 07:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Journeys End

The set-up of a captain, junior officer and soldier-servant in a frontline dugout, more irritated by the idiocy of their out-of-touch superiors than by the enemy, is an obvious and acknowledged homage to the classic play Journey's End which used to be widely set to teenagers when I was growing up. I've seen Stephen Fry admit as much in an interview. I'm not going to add it without a cite as somebody will delete it.

Assuming Blackadder is a company commander, like Stanhope in the play, there would have been other lieutenants reporting to him. Platoons were a new invention at that time and were kept very much under the company commander's thumb. But this is just a comedy series, of course. Paulturtle (talk) 02:29, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Blackadder Goes Forth

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

This 2007 addition has unsourced or badly sourced information (IMDB, etc) which fails criteria 2 of the GACR. Additionally, there may be some WP:CRUFT. Spinixster (chat!) 01:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.