Talk:Black Sunday (1960 film)

Black Sunday (1960 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 18, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Film: Italian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

Horror High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 30 December 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Title of this article

A this is english wikipedia, i believe the english title should take precedence instead of the italian one? but which english title? 82.26.17.115 12:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it is to be renamed, which I agree is probably a good idea, it should be changed to Black Sunday (1960 film), as that is the film's most commonly utilized title in various reference books/periodicals/websites. -Hal Raglan 01:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

I've re-written this article. A lot of it has stayed in-tact or just expanded upon. The plot is the same, I've removed some reviews which I feel don't really express a lot (I actually found the '"Castle of Frankenstein magazine one, but its just an anonymous article saying its one of the best horror films in recent years, and does not go into details). I've moved around some details and removed unsourced bits and cleaned up the citation. If anyone wants to bring anything back, I don't think it's too bad of an idea, but just maybe format the source up a pinch. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Andrzejbanas! I've pretty much finished my usual "expansions". Feel free to make any changes or suggestions that you wish - I think it's much closer to our work on Blood and Black Lace and Danger: Diabolik now. PatTheMoron (talk) 02:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! I've went through it to make sure some of it matches copyright and MOS:FILM edits, but you added a lot of strong work. Thanks for your help! Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with most of the clean-up you've done with my alterations, but I'm just wondering if the "Asa's execution" image could be used in place of the image of Steele that is presently used. Or should it be a screenshot from the Blu-ray as in Blood and Black Lace? I just think that that example of the film's iconography would be helpful for the readers in both illustrating the impact it had on Steele's career and the movie's influence. 13:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

That's the issue, as there is no real "one picture" that might properly capture how the image relates to other films as an influence. I was considering have a side-by-side comparison of the pierced face of Asa and the woman in Tim Burton's film, but it's not quite as strong the Blood and Black Lace one, which has been re-done at least three times in film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

I've left the writing credits and cinematography credits blank in the infobox per the prose in the article. As research has dictated, it's not clear who wrote the film and the credits very from sources beyond the film credits. If you want to add anything there, please discuss it here first as it does not seem to be clear. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:11, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Black Sunday (1960 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Improve the non-free use rationale for the poster with this template.

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here and in the rest of the article, films should have year dates after their first mention.

Done. I didn't add the years to ones where the title is re-used or the year is noted earlier in a sentence. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the commas after "in 1961", "United Kingdom", and "reviews in Italy".

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot and cast

Plot is under 700 words, so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
Remove the commas after "vows revenge" and "of her life".

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think "cricifix" might be a typo.

Indeed it is. Fixed. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add a comma after "beauty restored".

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why the "credits adapted" sentence is small?

Not that I know of. I've restored it back to normal size. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production

Remove the comma after "film of his own".

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"being around" → "was around" (to remove the double use of "being")

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The word "bares" might be another typo.

Changed phrasing. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "unsatisfactory".

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add commas after "Choma Kruvajan", "Khoma Brut", "Bachelor of Hearts (1958)"

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"travelled" → "traveled" (consistency)

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the commas after "later in life", "cast in bronze", "scenes together", "George Higgins III", and "Andrej and Kruvajan".

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"scene which" → "scene in which"

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release

"licence" → "license" (consistency)

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

This section looks good.

Legacy and influence

"materialised" → "materialized" (consistency)

Done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Archive sources.

Done. Think there was only the NYT article not archived. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·