Jump to content

Talk:Black Press

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Major?

[edit]

Are any of the newspapers considered major? I am going to change it to minor newspapers.Eiad77 (talk) 23:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Black Press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

more defunct Black Press newspapers?

[edit]

I noticed article lists "Richmond Review" in British Columbia, but as far as i know that newspaper is defunct (closed around six years ago?) and no Richmond paper is listed at https://www.blackpress.ca/publications/ . Richmond Review included in 2015 Oct 11 Wayback, but gone from same list a few weeks later in 2015 Oct 30 Wayback. Makes me wonder if some other newspapers listed in article are also defunct. --EarthFurst (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EarthFurst, thanks for the comment. I agree that it's probably very out of date, and it's hard to say if it was ever fully accurate to begin with. I'm not sure there's great value in trying to list all the papers they own, or the dates they were/are published, if we can't consistently find accurate info/sourcing for that. Might be better to reconfigure this to reflect "some of the papers" in each region, and list only those for which we have a source. What do you think? -Pete Forsyth (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe move publications not in current list (https://www.blackpress.ca/publications/ ) to "Former or defunct" subsections? ("Former" for newspaper now published by someone else?) --EarthFurst (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In reply to "list only those for which we have a source": for publications we don't have a source for, how about adding Template:Citation needed tag, then removing publications that have been "citation needed" tagged for a month? --EarthFurst (talk) 21:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]