Talk:Black Organization (Case Closed)

Box Characters

I added to the Case Closed Template the other members of the Black Organization that have articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artist Formerly Known As Whocares (talk • contribs) 21:48, 29 May 2007

Cleanup raised

I put on a cleanup tag on this article. It is fully disorganized and has a very big trivia section which ought to be integrated. Since I don't have much interest in this part of Conan, I'd rather ask others to do this. --Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 21:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find it impossible to intergrate all the trivia listed into the article, however, since some of the information listed there is important, removing it completely would also be out of the question. Therefore for the time being, it'll probably remain as is. CH (talk) 21:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Character merges

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Resolved

– Merge all except Gin (Case Closed), which was opposed due to possible existance of sources

Per a request for a neutral editor to make this suggestion, I am tagging multiple character articles for merge here as it is felt that they fail all relevant notability guidelines for having their own articles: WP:N, WP:PLOT, and WP:WAF. They are believed to have no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources and are incapable of reaching GA status. As such, it is felt that they should be merged to this sublist of the main Case Closed character list. I've created individual sections below for each character. Please leave your views in each. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gin (Case Closed)

Oppose: Functionally the main antagonist for most of the series, and I imagine that manga and anime reviews could bring up some comments on him that could give third party sources.kuwabaratheman (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Vineyard

I'm unsure on this one. She's important, but I don't know what third party sources could be found. If some reliable ones could be found, I'd say to keep the article, but if not, it'd be hard to oppose merging.kuwabaratheman (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vodka (Case Closed)

Support: Basically invisible even when he's on screen.kuwabaratheman (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

General

Support or Merge all: "They [...] have no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources and are incapable of reaching GA status." That may change someday, but right now, these articles are nothing but paraphrased plot summaries. -- Goodraise (talk) 06:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.