User talk:CH
Hello CH, and welcome to Wikipedia! The first thing you should know is that we encourage you to be bold. I see you already have on the [[]] article. Feel free to keep editing and improving articles, by clicking any 'edit' link.
If you'd like to test what Wikipedia can do, check out the sandbox - just type and save the page and your text will appear. That's the beauty of a Wiki.
For more information check out our tutorial - it's designed with newcomers in mind, as is the help section. If you'd like to get involved with current projects, have a look at the Community Portal. There are always tasks for users to do, ranging from copyediting to expanding stubs.
I hope you'll enjoy your time here, but be warned, it can become addictive! Feel free to message me, I'm more than happy to help. As an added tip, sign any message you post so users know that you've said it. To do so is delightfully simple, just use the wikicode ~~~~.
Once again, welcome! James Kendall [talk] 23:32, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Chianti (Case Closed), Korn (Case Closed) and Tequila (Case Closed) are now on AfD
[edit]I have requested these three articles for deletion because they have no remitting off-universe notability per WP:FICT. Please discuss this request on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chianti (Case Closed). Thank you for your attention. --Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 21:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Thumbelina: A Magical Story
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thumbelina: A Magical Story, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 (talk) 22:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Thumbelina: A Magical Story
[edit]
I have nominated Thumbelina: A Magical Story, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thumbelina: A Magical Story. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Raven1977 (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing me with this. Looks like someone else filled in the missing information and references for me. Thanks. CH (talk) 04:27, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rose Boyz
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Rose Boyz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Rose Boyz and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. sixtynine • spill it • 01:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Rose Boyz
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rose Boyz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Self-published book; notability not established.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... discospinster talk 02:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
The article FBI (Case Closed) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Lacks Notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 11:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
"Kir(Case Closed)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kir(Case Closed). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 28#Kir(Case Closed) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Slashme (talk) 09:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)