Talk:Black Krrsantan

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 11 June 2022 by reviewer Styyx (talk · contribs).

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Star Wars Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Black Krrsantan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 July 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a reviewer called Black Krrsantan one of "the scariest characters in Star Wars history"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black Krrsantan.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

~~... that reviewer Eric Francisco called Black Krrsantan one of the scariest Star Wars characters?~~ Source: [1]

** ALT1: ... that Black Krrsantan fought Chewbacca? Source: [2]

- Reviewed:
- Comment: I do not know if this counts as a new article or not as it was a draft that has recently been accepted.

Created by Kaleeb18 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Unfortunately, this article is not new enough to be eligible for DYK: it was moved from draft form to the mainspace on June 11, but only nominated for DYK on June 20 (past the seven-day limit). The article has not been expanded fivefold or promoted to GA status during this time period, either, so can't qualify under those alternative routes. I think it's not far off from being GA-worthy -- if the nominator wishes to do so in future, they could put "Black Krrsantan" through the GA review process and then afterwards re-nominate for DYK. Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alanna the Brave, I'd like to point out WP:DYKSG#D9: The "seven days old" limit can be extended for a day or two upon request. In this case, I don't see why Kaleeb18 should be refused such a request for two days, which I think is implied by their initial Comment above. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:45, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: I was under the impression that extending the deadline is discouraged when there is a large existing backlog of DYK nominations, but if you think I should, I can overlook that and do a full review. I note that Kaleeb18 has at least one other DYK nomination awaiting review (which is new enough to pass eligibility criteria). Alanna the Brave (talk) 11:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, okay then -- as per BlueMoonset's strong support for such (and for the sake of keeping things moving), I'll overlook the 7-day criteria for this nomination. It complies with other criteria (comments below), and I have only one small text edit request.

Article is long enough and otherwise eligible (has not previously appeared on Main Page).
Article is supported by inline citations and list of references. Hook content is cited.
No dispute templates on article.
I ran Earwig to check for copy-vio issues: One source comes up with a 94% similarity,[3] but it seems pretty clear it's a mirror Wiki site that has copied the Wikipedia article (not the other way around). I checked other sources flagged with lower similarities, and I'm satisfied there are no copy-vio issues there -- it's just flagging names of TV episodes and longer pieces of text that are clearly marked as direct quotations in the Wikipedia article.
Article leans very positive about Black Krrsantan, but that seems reflective of general opinion and critics. Neutral enough.
Nominator has less than five DYK credits (this one would make #4), so no QPQ required.
Hook is short enough and properly formatted. Seems interesting and appropriately "hooky." --> For clarity's sake, however, I think it would be worth referring to Eric Francisco as "reviewer Eric Francisco" for the benefit of anyone who doesn't know who he is. Once this edit is made, I think the nomination will be ready to move forward. Alanna the Brave (talk) 22:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator has made the text adjustment, and I'm now satisfied that this hook is ready to go. Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:52, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alanna the Brave and Kaleeb18: Typically, DYK doesn't include the names of people unless they are notable enough to have an article. Suggesting some ALTs below:

ALT0a: ... that a reviewer called Black Krrsantan one of the scariest Star Wars characters?
ALT0b: ... that a reviewer called Black Krrsantan one of "the scariest characters in Star Wars history"?

Thoughts? Z1720 (talk) 15:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Makes sense to me -- thanks for the suggested replacements. Personally, I like ALT0b (full quote seems more impactful). Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 I agree with ALT0b as well. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 16:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-adding tick per original review and above. ALT0b preferred. Z1720 (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Came across this nomination while reading Template:Did you know nominations/Garsa Fwip; is this (Krrsantan) their sixth DYK nomination? Per a recent rule change, the QPQ requirement was changed so that it is a nominator's nominations rather than their credits that count towards the QPQ requirement. As such, if this is was their sixth nomination, they need to provide a QPQ for this one. If this is their fifth, no QPQ is needed. @Kaleeb18: Can you please clarify if this is indeed your sixth nomination? Courtesy ping @Sammi Brie, Alanna the Brave, and Z1720:. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5: These two nominations came in 12 minutes apart. Since this one (#6) was approved, I withheld approval on #5 until QPQ was supplied. (Note: nominator is away at a church camp for the next several days.) I would normally donate a QPQ (especially with how many I'm doing right now), but it's really important to get that first review under their belt. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:08, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Restoring tick per the above review. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Black K" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Black K and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 22#Black K until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 05:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]