Talk:Bishop of Llandaff Church in Wales High School

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 November 2005. The result of the discussion was no consensus leaning to keep.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cardiff Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cardiff, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cardiff-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CardiffWikipedia:WikiProject CardiffTemplate:WikiProject CardiffCardiff articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent additions

An anonymous editor has recently made several additions to the article which seem designed to cast the school in a negative light. While the article could see significant expansion from its current state, it is important that it retains a neutral point of view. The statements about uniform are broadly correct but it is inappropriate to make subjective statements about the perceived "neatness" of pupils, while in a balanced article it is unclear why the recent uniform changes would be relevant; similarly, the results/headmaster section is not written from a neutral stance and extrapolates declining performance from a single data point, which is statistically meaningless. I have removed much of this information and ask that it is not re-inserted without a rewrite to comply with our editing policies.

To the anonymous editor: please consider creating an account on Wikipedia, which will allow other editors to communicate with you more easily and help you to keep track of pages you have edited. --YFB ¿ 00:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Results

I think the text referring to best results in Wales/Estyn should now be deleted -there is no reference to allow a date. The latest date given for any info is 2002!

By own survey of results in Wales schools in the last few years would put Bishop of Llandaff way behind many others e.g Stanwell (Penarth). So I think the statement should be justified or removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.141.82 (talk) 10:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bishop of Llandaff Church in Wales High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222175447/http://bishopllandaffhighschool.fluencycms.co.uk/Marion-Centre to http://bishopllandaffhighschool.fluencycms.co.uk/Marion-Centre

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]