Talk:Birmingham Coach Station

Buses: Stations Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands: Birmingham Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Birmingham task force.

New coach station

Images of the proposed coach station are now available (search Google images for "digbeth coach").--Shantavira 19:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just getting permission to use the images is the problem. - Erebus555 19:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary coach station

The literature put out by NatEx is contradictory as to whether they are calling the temporary coach station Birmingham Central or Birmingham Coach Station. As there is no other coach station in Birmingham it hardly matters, but I have put Birmingham Central Coach Station as a compromise.--Shantavira|^{feed me} 19:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube

Birmingham Mail is a reliable source, but Youtube isn't. I have added a unreliable source tag in the hope that this video or a related article can be found on Birmingham Mail's own website, rather than linking to the youtube version - purely for the source to "hold more weight". Feel free to remove the tag when a link directly to the article on www.birminghammail.net can be found. Willdow (talk) 12:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the whole sentence as it is no longer relevant.

Photo please

We need a photo of the new station, whereupon all the others can be deleted.--Shantavira|^{feed me} 12:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its been a couple months since the new one opened - are there still no photos out there we can use? _Will^dow (Talk) 13:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Birmingham Coach Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060404135300/http://www.birmingham.gov.uk:80/GenerateContent?CONTENT_ITEM_ID=3157&CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE=0&MENU_ID=1338 to http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/GenerateContent?CONTENT_ITEM_ID=3157&CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE=0&MENU_ID=1338

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Birmingham Coach Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009121948/http://www.lsh.co.uk/pages/news_detail.asp?id=1251 to http://www.lsh.co.uk/pages/news_detail.asp?id=1251

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]