Talk:Birmingham City Council
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]Der Speigel reports 2000 jobs to go??andycjp (talk) 00:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
2007 elections
[edit]2007 election results have recently been made available via http://birminghamnewsroom.com/2011/04/local-elections-2011-background-briefing-pack/ Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Birmingham City Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110906033333/http://openlylocal.com:80/councils/167-Birmingham-City-Council to http://openlylocal.com/councils/167-Birmingham-City-Council
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Majority
[edit]Actual majority for Labour is 40 not 80 surely? Neil W (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Start-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Start-Class England-related articles
- Mid-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Start-Class West Midlands articles
- Unknown-importance West Midlands articles
- WikiProject West Midlands
- Start-Class Birmingham articles
- Top-importance Birmingham articles