Talk:Bio-based building materials
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review
[edit]The overall article is well written and structured. In the Further reading section if the links to the articles can be updated that would be of great help.
Thanks Muhammadrehan645 (talk) 12:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for your comments and suggestions!
- I've just updated the links on the "Further readings" section.
- Many thanks! Camilla.vi (talk) 13:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Review 2
[edit]The article sounds interesting, in particular the description of the different typologies of bio-based materials and the different fields of application. Use of references is also very good. My only suggestion is to provide, if available, more further readings in order to deepen the topic.
Thanks you. Ilmaggio98 (talk) 12:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks!
- I'll think about more books on the topic to add there, thank you! Camilla.vi (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Review 3
[edit]I am sorry for my late communication. Your use of English is good but I did a few (and small) corrections. However, I noticed you placed the reference numbers before puntuations and sometimes after it. To make it uniform I placed them after as usual.
At the end of the second paragraph of the section about embodied and operational carbon, it seams you repeat the same concept twice. I corrected it but please, check that I manteined the intended meaning.
I put brackets around "LVL" and "CLT" as they are acronyms you cited for the first time in your article
Anyway the topic is open and very interesting and the text is well structured. SergioCarlosMiguel (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Camilla.vi (talk) 08:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Observations and suggestions for improvements
[edit]The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following an expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in July 2024.
A very well written article, with appropriate graphical items and many references - all carefully selected and appropriately cited. The only downside is that, in my opinion, the introduction is a bit too short and too simple - it should be expanded to help the reader unfamiliar with the subject. The remaining sections show the right level of detail. Minor formatting issues (e.g. superscripts in the units of thermal conductivity).
- C-Class Environment articles
- Unknown-importance Environment articles
- C-Class Science Policy articles
- Unknown-importance Science Policy articles
- C-Class Climate change articles
- Unknown-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Unknown-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class CE articles
- Unknown-importance CE articles
- WikiProject Civil engineering articles