Talk:Binoculars Building

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Early comments

19/10/08: Deleted misinformation about the binoculars housing conference rooms or having skylights. I worked in the building and the binoculars are sculptural only and do not contain areas of the office.

11/05/11: Removed link to website as it leads to a parking page. Also, I don't know about the rest of the companies listed on this page but Google is now a tenant of the building. Ddreier (talk) 01:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gehry's paucity of LA projects

Christopherwils (talk · contribs) stated "Omitted "his last project in LA until the Walt Disney Concert Hall began construction in 1999" becasue this is not a significant fact. While it is true that Gehry had no LA projects between 1991-1999, this bit of info is not needed here.".

This information is relevant; Gehry built many projects in Los Angeles, so taking time off is worth noting. It's not much different than saying "Reagan was president of the United States, followed by Bush". This article is very sparse, it'd be better to put efforts into building it than removing cited information. It might not belong in the lede, but the article isn't long enough to be anything but lede at this point. tedder (talk) 00:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Binoculars Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsupported citation removals (hostile vendetta?)

FAIR-MINDEDNESS NEEDED HERE Folks, I removed a citation that did not support the claim at hand (I checked carefully). I remember this interesting point about the artwork and the building, and this article used to have a different citation for this point from the Public Art in Public Places organization. I see at some time it was removed without a stated reason. I invite anyone to weigh in here, because I believe there has been an unfounded vendetta against what are clearly legitimate citations from this source. The correct citation for this point should be to "Giant Binoculars" (1991) by Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen. I myself am actually too AFRAID of that editor's vendetta wrath against that org. to do the good job and put the best citation in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:2E07:265D:A0D1:DFBA:C5A8:90EF (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The entry on Public Arts in Public Places was deleted as unnotable, as agreed by several editors and an administrator. Many (I think it was more than 80) of the PAiPP cites placed in Wikipedia article were removed along the way for the same reason. Your alleging this is/was a "vendetta" reminds me of some of name-calling that ensued in that discussion. The point did not hold up under scrutiny and is as inflammatory as it is unsupported. Barte (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]