Jump to content

Talk:Bình Dương province

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Binh Duong province)

Han tu

[edit]

Chinese Wikipedia gives , while the Nom Foundation gives . Badagnani (talk) 05:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there previous history on this?

[edit]

The map at the beginning of Frances Fitzgerald's Fire in the Lake, which was copyrighted in 1972, already shows a Binh Duong Province (and Binh Long to its immediate north), both evidently resulting from a division of the Thu Dou Mot Province shown in the map at the end of Marvin Gettleman's Viet Nam: History, Documents .... published in 1965. Is there any information available on why this area has been redivided or reunited, evidently more than once each, in the last half-century? Terry J. Carter (talk) 16:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Binh Duong provinceBinh Duong Province – Revert capitalization to pre-Kauffner status and current consensus. NVanMinh (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:An Giang province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:59, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:An Giang Province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bac Ninh Province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:44, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bình Dương Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bình Dương Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]