Talk:Binciola
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Binciola article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
[edit]Gbook hits:
- "Binciola" (86)
- "Binčola" (8)
@Director: Did you even care to review the name before reverting with the comment "Rollback known-to-be-opposed, unilateral, non-consensus move."--Zoupan 13:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Reverted once again (14:01), without discussing the above fact.--Zoupan 14:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Be with you in a moment. I can not instantaneously reply to every post. -- Director (talk) 14:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- I investigated your source and I agree with your addition of the "Name" section (even though its WP:NONENG...); as for the rest, I think we should discuss the topic in a more general venue. I propose your talkpage, if that's alright. -- Director (talk) 14:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Category talk:Ragusan noble families for the topic, but at this page we are discussing this particular article. Why wouldn't you support a move (or rather, revert) to Binciola?--Zoupan 14:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- (Replied at Category talk:Ragusan noble families.) -- Director (talk) 16:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Category talk:Ragusan noble families for the topic, but at this page we are discussing this particular article. Why wouldn't you support a move (or rather, revert) to Binciola?--Zoupan 14:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- I investigated your source and I agree with your addition of the "Name" section (even though its WP:NONENG...); as for the rest, I think we should discuss the topic in a more general venue. I propose your talkpage, if that's alright. -- Director (talk) 14:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)