Talk:Bimaran casket

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Museum Mid‑importance

	This article relates to the British Museum. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one, as needed.British MuseumWikipedia:GLAM/British MuseumTemplate:WikiProject British MuseumBritish Museum-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Afghanistan Mid‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 8 January 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Bimaran Casket. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Requested move 8 January 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bimaran casket → Bimaran Casket
Bajaur casket → Bajaur Casket

– For consistency with the article titles for other particular caskets that are named in English (Becket Casket, Brescia Casket, Franks Casket, Kanishka Casket, Leyre Casket, Morgan Casket, Veroli Casket, Royal Casket, Uttoxeter Casket, Troyes Casket, Cammin Casket). The infobox of the Bimaran casket article already uses the capital letter. I'm not suggesting uppercase for Noli me tangere casket → Noli me tangere Casket because that title is mostly not in English, so perhaps it should not use the English style of capping. Moving the others to sentence case could also be considered as an alternative. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 06:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - a proper name. Johnbod (talk) 04:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clearly proper names. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Consistency will only be achieved by moving toward consistency with guidelines, not away from that as proposed here. See n-gram for Bimaran and Bajaur caskets, where it's clear that these are nowhere near the threshold crition of MOS:CAPS of consistently capitalized in sources, or of WP:NCCAPS of always capitalized even in sentences. Look at [1], where it's capped in titles, but never in sentences. I'll be happy to help fix the others. Dicklyon (talk) 22:51, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also see n-grams for others we should fix to lowercase: Brescia, Kanishka, Veroli, Troyes, Cammin. Fixing these will remove the temptation to move the wrong way in trying for consistency; some of the others need more careful checking than we can get via n-grams. Dicklyon (talk) 00:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dicklyon. Casing treatment is very inconsistent in the source material. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 00:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—a proper name? Prove it, Johnbod. Tony (talk) 04:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.