Jump to content

Talk:Bill Wattenburg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV

[edit]

Most of the stuff in the article should be deleted unless it can be backed up with sources. There appears to be a lot of original research and point-of-view statements. 4.243.146.96 01:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, better sourcing needed for many aspects of this article. I'm attempting to source any of my new edits to this article, such as the one yesterday I added about Dr. Bill's call for US troops to go house to house in Oakland to look for weapons. CriticalChris 02:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "Gun Grabber" title sounds silly....get the feeling whoever compiled this stuff wanted it to sound that way...--173.150.68.236 (talk) 06:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please make your edits as appropriate; I can own that title "gun grabber," having edited it into the article, but am open to other ways to name his confiscatory ideology. Nonetheless, the fact remains that he cavalierly suggested to a major newspaper reporter that we use a standing army to piss all over the 2nd and 4th amendments to the United States Constitution, and isn't that quite silly! CriticalChris 00:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mn wattenburg1.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mn wattenburg1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Former KGO pages

[edit]

Following cancellation of Bill Wattenburg's show on KGO-AM radio in early December 2011, the station purged his Web page there. However, it can still be viewed in archived form from February 2011 at the Wayback Machine, http://web.archive.org/web/20110129225019/http://kgoradio.com/sectional.asp?id=33179. As of this writing, his personal site, http://www.wattenburg.us/, still works. Even though the article claims Bill Wattenburg has joined KSCO AM-1080 in Santa Cruz, California, since the split from KGO, the KSCO online program schedule does not reflect this (yet); it may still be in preliminary talks and not a done deal. The edit to the article by anonymous editor 208.80.119.67 on 2011-12-10 may have been premature.  — QuicksilverT @ 22:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

People have been reacting to a one-day fill-in deal in early December 2011 at KSCO as if Dr. Wattenburg were a regular host there. See http://capitola.patch.com/articles/former-kgo-host-bill-wattenburg-migrating-to-ksco.  — QuicksilverT @ 01:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

His Standing as a Scientist

[edit]

I believe this issue should be clarified. He's not a physicist, as I understand, just some guy with weird, although trivial, ideas and a PhD degree, which per se hardly has any scientific meaning. Stating that "as a scientist, he had solved a problem of trains not visible on the computer screen" is just hilarious.

My personal opinion is that his knowledge of physics, as conveyed by his talks on the radio, is rudimentary, and at times plain wrong.

So, it would be a shame, I believe, to call him a scientist (except on par with Jesus Christ the Scientist) and/or a physicist. Talk show host, that's fine, though.

Vlad Patryshev (talk) 06:06, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bill Wattenburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Wattenburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]