Talk:Biker metal

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 June 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

Biker metal is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

WHY IS THIS PAGE STILL HERE? THIS IS NOT A MUSICAL GENRE AND MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL. Period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.19.244.115 (talk) 07:31, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What the...?

Biker Metal? Biker punk? What weird Journalist pulled this from his heine ? KhlavKhalash (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? So Wikipedia doesn't have a page for Sleaze Rock, which is actually a REAL music genre that had spawned dozens of bands from all over the world for three different decades... but it has a page for the non-existing "Biker Metal", that is only found in a couple of reviews written by some moron on a music site? "Biker Metal", which according to these "sources" is basically Motorhead's music and Steve Jones's Fire & Gasoline, so it is exactly the same as saying Hard Rock or NWOBHM? Like, for real? And you guys even had a discussion to keep this completely stupid thing up? Seriously? Please, never let a user that describes himself as a vegetarian moderate on metal topics. Or on any topic ever. Seriously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.61.150.231 (talk) 06:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, notability on Wikipedia is based off of independent coverage in reliable sources. Between the main article and and the genre's list page, there's around 50 citations from a range of respected writers like Martin Popoff, well-established publishers like Routledge and Hachette Book Group, and magazines such as Rolling Stone, Guitar World and Classic Rock, making it notable and more than just something "only found in a couple of reviews written by some moron on a music site". If you think Wikipedia should have a sleaze rock page, you're always free to create it if you can find enough reliable sources, and this probably isn't the page to discuss the possible creation of that article.

I've also been called a lot of things by IPs on this site, and this is definitely the first time my credibility has been questioned because of my dietary choices, but you should probably know that Wikipedia has a no personal attacks rule. Cheers. Issan Sumisu (talk) 07:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This pseudo-genre shouldn't be here. Anti-Nowhere League has nothing in common with The Obsessed and Orange Goblin... 'Biker metal' is just an aesthetic description at best, just like pirate metal or something. At least, it shouldn't be considered at the same level with real genres, like thrash, black, death and so on. Now Wikipedia treats it just like another established genre. It's just obvious non-sense. 212.34.48.63 (talk) 21:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- … «biker metal band Motörhead» ha ha.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.15.218.162 (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biker metal is not a real genre.

I am writing this as an add on to the last post. Motorhead seems to be the only example anybody can think of when they hear the term "Biker metal". In reality Motorhead were a heavy metal/speed metal/hard rock band. All of those genres are rooted in blues/rock ´n´ roll. The biker culture enjoys heavy metal, hard rock and certian types of punk rock but that´s the only conection there. Instead of treating it like a real genre, a more apropriate description would be "umberela term". Example "extreme metal" is an umberela term used to describe harder and more agressive subgenres of metal, this could be pretty much anything that´s heavy and agressive. Biker metal/biker punk is more of an umberela term then an established music genre. 212.114.206.193 (talk) 00:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You'd need a WP:RELIABLESOURCE to support that idea. Googling "biker metal" "umbrella term" turns up only 453 results, and none of those say that it is one, and most aren't reliable. Issan Sumisu (talk) 08:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

_________________________

So the fact that by searching "Biker metal" on Google, 95% of the results that turn out refer to biker-styled metal attire and accessories instead of the music genre makes this supposed non-existing thing eligible as a music genre? Please, someone enlighten me on this. Because if I Google "Black metal" or "Sludge metal", the search clearly refers to them only as music genres. Which is definitely not the case here, where it shows me gloves, belts, patches and so on, for bikers. Please, someone delete this non-sense. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.67.119.221 (talk) 04:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]