Talk:Bigraph

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Untitled

Can we consider not redirecting to bipartite graphs, and instead including a disambiguation page so that it is possible to add an entry for the theory of Bigraphs, the concurrency meta-model by Milner et al? This is a notable theory and strangely absent from wikipedia. e.g. refs: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=bigraphs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.226.142.243 (talk)

Certainly there can be such an article if somebody wants to write it. But right now, it doesn't exist so a disambiguation page is not appropriate, nor is an article that is devoid of content with only an external link and maintenance tags. As such, I am reverting back to a redirect. -- Whpq (talk) 17:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We could really do with some illustrations, given that one of the purported benefits of bigraphs is the ability to construct diagrams that are completely formal. If nobody has any free images to offer, I will try to create something. GianP (talk) 15:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the heading "For graphs on two kinds of vertices, where all edges connect different kinds of vertices, see Bipartite graph" misunderstands the term 'Bipartite graph'. 89.204.177.130 (talk) 03:39, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have neatened up the text in accordance with your suggestion. Wicko3 (talk) 09:51, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]