Talk:Big Bottom massacre

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Mid-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Squatting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Need a more balanced discussion of the Ohio Company of Associates

The article appears to be biased against the Ohio Company of Associates. A more balanced discussion would be helpful. A number of references are available which provide an alternative point of view, suggesting that the settlers of the Ohio Company were more friendly with the Indians, but were caught in between disputes with the Indians and more provocative settlers in Virginia (modern West Virginia) and Kentucky. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.23.68.40 (talk) 16:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bias claim never supported

Chevron suggested adding sources, but never did so. Further, the issue of 'friendliness' is better dealt with in the [[Ohio Company of Associates] article, especially as there seems to be no evidence specific to BIg Bottom either way.Bill (talk) 17:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warbox should replace Infobox civilian attack

Items such as Perpetrators are inherently judgemental. All parties in the event require NPOV which is now impossible.Bill (talk) 18:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What to do with no reply

Not sure if this person is still active. Is Requests for comment best, or 3rd opinion.Bill (talk) 23:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: No debate about Ohio Company

Can someone remove the dispute box as it appears to be resolved?Bill (talk) 20:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This tag was removed in error. The npov box in the article is four years old, and any dispute seems resolved.Bill (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The war box is also inappropriate and should be replaced. Bill (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:GeorgeLouis - I hope we have the same goal. Thx. Bill (talk) 02:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harmar Campaign

The article Harmar campaign states in the Aftermath section the Big Bottom massacre was, at least in part, initiated as revenge for the U.S. attacks just months earlier. No mention of that is made in this article. Should the Harmar campaign have at least a casual mention in this article, or should Big Bottom be removed from the Harmar article? Canute (talk) 14:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]