Talk:Bicton House, Devon

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

The repository of arts - public domain

I assume that The Repository of arts, literature,... is in the public domain, since it was published in 1825, well beyond the [List of countries' copyright lengths "standard" length of time for copyrighted material for the UK]. The archive.org link for the article does not state copyright status one way or another (i.e., no copyright field with the standard source information in this case).

Any ideas how I can determine or verify whether it is in the public domain? Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like the 4th series is no longer in copyright status, per this link. So, at the moment, I'll assume that it's good, unless someone tells me differently.--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:55, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure any text first published in the early 19th century will be OK copyright-wise. However, it's pretty obvious that Lt took his long quote from the Devon County Council website which is where he admits (see link in Source) he got the graphic of the house from. So based on WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT, if we keep that quote (do we need to?), we should attribute there, as well as to the original source. —SMALL JIM 14:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's very helpful!, thanks. I'll likely work on it tomorrow.--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bicton House, Devon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923223406/http://www.devon.gov.uk/print/index/cultureheritage/libraries/localstudies/lsdatabase.htm?menuOpen=2&url=etched%2Fetched%2F5437%2F1.html to http://www.devon.gov.uk/print/index/cultureheritage/libraries/localstudies/lsdatabase.htm?menuOpen=2&url=etched%2Fetched%2F5437%2F1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]