Talk:Bhava samadhi

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bhava samadhi article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hinduism: Philosophy Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Philosophy task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Criticism

Criticism tag deleted. Retaining the misuse and controversy section is important because:

1) It is essential to understanding the genuine bhava samadhi, as described in the scriptures and accounts of the lives of great saints such as Chaitanya, Mirabai, Ramakrishna and others. The definition cannot be made clear without the contrast.

2) The controversies and misuses of bhava samadhi have been well documented (see references in article). The extensive material, which clarifies the definition of bhava samadhi, deserves a dedicated section.

3) On the topic of bhava samadhi, this material on controversies and misuse is of interest in its own right. It is a major part of teh historical phenomenon.

Ramakrishnananda (talk) 12:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page should really reflect a historical perceptive and not the belief system of certain groups and their opinions.

General Aims

This page should really reflect a historical perceptive and not the belief system of certain groups and their opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivekananda Santanadharma (talk • contribs) 07:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bhava samadhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored

I've restored the page; the detailed info was undue for the samadhi page. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]