Talk:Bhadarwahi language

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Jammu and Kashmir Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir.
	This article was last assessed in June 2015.

Which spelling?

User:The Ultimate has recently moved this article from Bhadrawahi language to Bhaderwahi. Is there any reason to prefer this spelling? Most of the standard tertiary sources (none of them in-depth) use Bhadrawahi, there's a recently published grammar that spells it Bhadarwahi, but Bhaderwahi is nowhere to be seen. – Uanfala (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

The word Bhaderwahi refers to anything that belongs to Bhaderwah. The suffix i is an indication of the that. Similarly the language spoken in or near by Bhaderwah is also called Bhaderwahi. The actual pronounciation of the word forces us to write it as either Bhadarwahi or Bhaderwahi. If it's written as Bhadrawahi, it completely distorts the real language as I myself am a native speaker of this language. Tough it can be written both as Bhaderwahi or Bhadarwahi but I've preferred Bhaderwahi because it is used mostly when used officially. Below is the link from the official site of Bhaderwah which uses the same spelling throughout. www.bhaderwah.com/history.html Please revert back if you find better explanation of using Bhadrawahi instead of Bhadarwahi or Bhaderwahi and let me know. I'll try to correct, if I may. The Ultimate (talk) 05:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If Bhadrawahi distorts the pronunciation, then it's out (provided there exist alternatives that are equally common in English). So the choice then is between Bhadarwahi and Bhaderwahi. Apart from the observation the latter spelling seems less common in the linguistics literature, I don't have any strong opinions here. – Uanfala (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The Ultimate: I've started an RM discussion below. – Uanfala (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 November 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as unopposed. (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 16:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bhaderwahi → Bhadarwahi – This is the more common spelling in the literature on the language. See also the discussion above. – Uanfala (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC) – Uanfala (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.