Talk:Bevagna
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I notice that elsewhere, notably on Italian Wiki, the frazioni are 5, and do not include Limigiano. On the other hand, the only print source I have in front of me, which can be considered an authority, is the DeAgostini guide to Umbria, 1996. It lists Limigiano but not Capro. DeAgostini is a major mapmaking firm, and the presumption is that they're right, although errors will occur with anyone. Limigiano is one of the larger villages in the comune, and not much smaller than Cantalupo, which is an unquestioned frazione. Capro is tiny. So for now, for me at least, the question is up in the air, but favoring Limigiano. Bill 01:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- The 2001 Istat census documents [1] report the following areas for Bevagna:
BEVAGNA * CANTALUPO GAGLIOLI LIMIGIANO TORRE DEL COLLE Campofondo Castelbuono Madonna della Pia Case Sparse
- Limigiano is included, but Capro is missing (it may well fall under BEVAGNA*, which is the proper city area, since this village is almost glued to the city itself). On the other side, there are official border signs for Capro along the road from Cannara to Bevagna, signs which usually are assigned to the fractions. I have never been to Limigiano, thus I do not know whether such signs are equally there. The official site of the municipality does not clarify whether there are legally acknowledged fractions, maybe a phone call can help ... (I am building a list of calls ....) --Cantalamessa 01:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- The statuto comunale (2000) [2], Art. 3, identifies the frazioni ‘storicamente riconosciute dalla comunità’ as:
Cantalupo Castelbuono Gaglioli Limigiano Torre del Colle
Photo
[edit]This photo doesn't represent the town at all well; and I'm even suspecting it might not be Bevagna.... If it is, it's a historical photograph, though; and suggests that the place is an awful dump, which it isn't: some splendid (and huge) medieval churchs, very clean, etc. Bill 01:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, the picture is indeed misleading. But it is not rare to find in Italy semi-abandoned houses side to side with freshly restored ones. Especially after earthquakes, this is typical. The citizens do not care or have no money, the comune officers are lazy or have no money, and the buildings perish. This said, I can print the picture and ask a beanate next time I go there :-) --Cantalamessa 01:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bevagna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040922214548/http://www.bevagna.net:80/ to http://www.bevagna.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 1 November 2016 (UTC)