Talk:Berney Arms railway station
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accuracy
[edit]"As the more direct line between Brundall and Yarmouth has been singled..."
I understand that the Yarmouth-Acle-Norwich line was never dualled in the first place. Provision was made for a it to be dualled when being built (e.g. bridge arch width & station platforms) but dualling never occured due to (as ever) costs. Trains do pass each other at Acle (I think) and most (if not all) stations have two lines through them (will provide source).
LewisR (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- that's what I have always thought too, but unfortunately I don't have a source available. Lingwood only has a single platform, but there is space for two. PaulJones (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Disused 2nd platforms at Lingwood and Acle (I think) - why do express yarmouth - norwich trains run via Reedham (that's why they are no quicker than the stopping service)if not to relieve the direct line. I believe the line was double until 1967. Source required before I add to page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.31.107 (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Confusion
[edit]""Express" trains between Yarmouth and Norwich take this longer route, and this is the reason why these apparently express trains in fact take much the same time as the stopping trains (via Acle)."
This suggests that 1) they take the longer route 2) They take much the same route as the Acle route. The two lines separate at Brundall. It's confusing to state that they take much the same route when it must be only the first 20% or so.
LewisR (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- I would have thought that linespeeds are a major factor in the timings. Its hardly a high speed line maintained for maximum speed of the few loco hauled trains that go on it. PaulJones (talk) 09:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Acording to working timetable (and experience) ALL "express" norwich <> yarmouth trains run via Reedham. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.31.107 (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Berney Arms railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718231432/http://www.berneyarms-station.co.uk/getting_to_berney_arms.php to http://www.berneyarms-station.co.uk/getting_to_berney_arms.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718231339/http://www.berneyarms-station.co.uk/adopting_a_station2.php to http://www.berneyarms-station.co.uk/adopting_a_station2.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110528064650/http://www.berneyarms-station.co.uk/ to http://www.berneyarms-station.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)