User talk:PaulJones
Welcome to PaulJones's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. |
This is PaulJones's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, PaulJones! I'm ulayiti, and I'd like to welcome you to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions, and I hope you'll like the place enough to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- How to avoid common mistakes
When commenting on talk pages or voting, you should always sign your name by typing in four tildes (~~~~). This way people will know who made the comment and can respond to you. If you have any questions at all, feel free to ask me on my talk page. You can also have a look at the help pages or put up a question at the village pump. Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing! - ulayiti (talk) 20:34, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- They certainly are. New users are always welcome here. - ulayiti (talk) 20:49, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
The Belle of Mayfair
[edit]Thanks for the links. I created a bunch of new stubs and expanded a bunch of old British musicals today and have to stop now. Any chance you could put something up for Edna May? She seems to be a really big actress of the time. Regards, --Ssilvers 18:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, will do. However, it can not be today as I have to finish for tonight. I will do something in the next day or two. Thanks for all your work on the late Victorian and Edwardian British musical! PaulJones 18:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- curiosity got the better of me. PaulJones 19:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Well, I thought I was working on WP:G&S, but one think led to another, and I've put up stubs or expanded several dozen British musicals, plus done articles on composers, writers, and performers. Help! I'm addicted to Wikipedia. --Ssilvers 22:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Expanded articles
[edit]I did a major expansion on Malcolm Sargent and Seymour Hicks. If you have time, see what you think. I'm sure they could use more wikifiying, correction of all my errors ;-) etc. Best regards, --Ssilvers 20:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'll give them a look. They certainly look comprehensive... PaulJones 21:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- THanks! Also Ellaline Terriss, Hicks' wife -- new entry. -- Ssilvers 23:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
A southern maid
[edit]Adrian Ross had nothing to do with the musical "A Southern Maid" from 1920 at Daly's (5 years after George Edwardes death, so Edwardes had nothing to do with it either.) It was first produced earlier in 1917 at Princes Theatre.
What confused the writer of the Ross article at the Boisestate site, I think was that there was a 1933 film of the same name that had a costume designer named Adrian Ross. See [1] and [2]. Best regards, --Ssilvers 04:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- I concede regarding the 1917 date. I am not so sure about stating that Adrian Ross had nothing to do with it though. See [[3]] and [[4]]. It may be that the Ross contribution was added in the 1920 production. PaulJones 09:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
I just spent a considerable amount of time looking around, and I am becoming more convinced that Ross did provide some lyrics. For some reason, the film credits him as a costume designer, but I am guessing that is a mistake. See my newest changes to the entry. -- Ssilvers 14:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- I think that we are slowly getting there! The Internet Movie Database gives Norman Hartnell as costume designer in the film version. There is certainly an interesting mix of people involved in that film. PaulJones 18:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Russell, Evett
[edit]I added info to Scott Russell and standardised the format with the other DOC biographies. Evett was also an ex-D'Oyly Carter. If you look at the stub, I added a link. Do you want to take a crack at expanding him? Best regards, --Ssilvers 15:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. Yes, I will do. I was planning to anyway at some point. Regards, PaulJones 17:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
W. S. Gilbert FA candidate
[edit]Hey, Paul: The W. S. Gilbert article has received a lot of work in the past month (and we responded to two peer reviews), and it has been nominated as a Featured Article. If you can get to it, please review it and then weigh in on the nomination at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/W. S. Gilbert, or else let us know if you have any further comments or suggestions about the article. Regards, -- Ssilvers 02:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I left some comments on your talk page. Hopefully they are helpful. PaulJones 21:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
I hope you don't mind, but I took the liberty of fixing the problems when I was going to Sam's page to talk to him about another subject. The Kendals (not Kendalls) were Tom Robertson's sister and her husband, but my reference source of choice indicated that another person was actually responsible for managing the theatre, so I just deleted the phrase. Adam Cuerden talk 22:34, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for these excellent comments. The Kendals starred in all these Fairy comedies, but I agree that it was not necessary to name them here. If you're satisfied with the article now, please go ahead and weigh in here -- Ssilvers 02:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- I am and I have. A great article. Well done to all involved. PaulJones 08:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:53, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Sargent's article has been considerably expanded. Please take another look when you have time. Can you add an image to it? I'm afraid that both Tim and I don't know how to do that. --Best regards, Ssilvers 17:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't know how to add images either. However, I see that someone has already done so. Has it really been so long since I last logged on to Wikipedia? PaulJones 18:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Tim knows how to do certain things, and I knew how to do other things, and between us, we fixed up the article. It's pretty nifty now, wouldn't you say? Thanks for your excellent edits. -- Ssilvers 19:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- It certainly is comprehensive! PaulJones 20:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Wenzel
[edit]- Is this his ballet? [5]
- Is this the same guy: Born in Napoli on the 23th Jenuary 1847, died in Asnières (Parigi) on the 21 August 1923? Operas: Le Chevalier Mignon, 1884 in Parigi; and L'Élève du Conservatoire, in Parigi in 1894? [6]
Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk)
- That I have not been able to confirm. There can't be too many composers called Leopold de Wenzel working in that period, but when I came across those references I was not able to link the productions to the composer at the Empire, so I did not include in the information. PaulJones (talk) 18:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Would you kindly add the references that you did find to the article? Right now it is entirely unreferenced. Thanks! Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Gene Cunningham
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Gene Cunningham, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Cunningham. Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Baron Golosh
[edit]What language is Baron Golosh in, if you know? I've been cleaning up Category:Operettas by giving all the entries subcategories of their own, by language. Baron Galosh is the only one left, because I can't tell what language it's in. Softlavender (talk) 07:53, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Update: Never mind, Ssilvers told me the language and someone else has added the correct category. Softlavender (talk) 04:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Weavers Way Co-op has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. » Swpbτ • ¢ 00:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
The article Squeak Piggy Squeak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced since 27 August 2006. Non notable game.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Martin Slavin
[edit]Hello, I am Martin Slavins grandaughter. I joined wiki to write an article about him when I realized that someone already had. I just wanted to thank you for starting it and if u don't mind my asking, ask you why you started it? And how you found some of the info? It was all stuff I already had but its always useful to try and find as many sources of info as I can. Thanks. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chachabrown (talk • contribs) 04:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Sorry I just realized I forgot to sign it. ( Chachabrown (talk) 04:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC))
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, PaulJones. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bad egg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad egg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Iblast listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iblast. Since you had some involvement with the Iblast redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:54, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, PaulJones. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"Frederick norton" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Frederick norton. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 6#Frederick norton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
"Frederic norton" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Frederic norton. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 6#Frederic norton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)