Jump to content

Talk:Bergdorf Goodman Building

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kimikel talk 01:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bergdorf Goodman Building
The Bergdorf Goodman Building
Created by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 666 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 14:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Excellent work! Looks good. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Bergdorf Goodman Building/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 00:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 12:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Very large article, guess I'm going to review this. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC) By looking at this, this is a drive-by nom, did you get consensus from Epicgenius?[reply]

@TheNuggeteer, thanks for taking up the review. It's a self-drive-by nomination, for the avoidance of doubt. I nominated this article a few days after creating it (i even double checked to see if this wasn't accidentally nominated by someone else). Epicgenius (talk) 12:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, came here from WP:GARC, thought Rollinginhisgrave was the nom, really sorry! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Due to Rollinginhisgrave rejecting his review, I'm giving him this review if he agrees, just want to notify you. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheNuggeteer, that sounds good. Thanks for the heads up. – Epicgenius (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria 1

[edit]

Spotcheck

[edit]
  1. Green tickY
  2. Green tickY
  3. Green tickY - Accepted in good faith, offline
  4. Green tickY - Accepted in good faith, offline
  5. Green tickY
  6. Green tickY - You can include more information about the source.
    I have added publisher and volume info. Epicgenius (talk) 13:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Green tickY - Accepted in good faith, offline
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Bergdorf Goodman Building/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 00:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Rollinginhisgrave (talk · contribs) 03:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. It's been a bit over a month since I've reviewed one of yours, and although my plan to get some variety in reviewers has fallen through in this case, I'm happy to review this over the next few days. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay, I'll get to the rest of this over the next few hours. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 07:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All done! Looking good, a few things to review. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and content

[edit]

Suggestions

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • [25] Green tickY
  • [50] Green tickY Though this article is claiming Brown bought the house in 1923.
  • [75] Green tickY
  • [101] Green tickY
  • [125] Green tickY
  • [150] Green tickY
  • [176] Green tickY
  • [200] Green tickY
  • [225] Magenta clockclock I think this is a stronger claim than the source is making
  • [250] Green tickY
  • [275] Green tickY

Other

[edit]
  • Images all appropriately tagged Green tickY (it is a shame there aren't images of the interior / window displays)
  • No issues with COPYVIO / OR Green tickY (earwig 36.3%, locations)
  • Broad / summary style Green tickY
  • Neutral Green tickY
  • Stable Green tickY

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I missed this. I'll fix these shortly. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rollinginhisgrave, sorry for the late responses. I have now addressed all the issues you've brought up. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking great, passing Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 22:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.