Talk:Benjamin Sellers

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 October 2022 by reviewer No such user (talk · contribs).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Craft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Craft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of craft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CraftWikipedia:WikiProject CraftTemplate:WikiProject CraftCraft articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it pulls from a wide variety of source materials linked in the article itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lauraachilders (talk • contribs) 08:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment DoubleGrazing Earwig gives 10% and 30% on two sites, and I can't see that it's a copy of the page you've linked either, so i've declined the G12 for now. Have I missed something? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Please explain where did you see a copyright violation? At the submission time, the article was quite short, and on a quick skim I cannot find that any of its contents is taken verbatim from the sources. No such user (talk) 08:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@No such user, @Jimfbleak: the 2nd para ("Sellers came to America...") seems to be cobbled together from this source, and the 2nd sentence of the 1st para from this. Remove those, and it's debatable whether there's a viable draft left, hence why I asked for G12 rather than revdel. Or that was my logic, at any rate. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's a big "meh" from me. Two sentences of overly close paraphrasing that could be solved with normal editing, and G12 would be akin to using an ballistic missile to kill a mosquito. Do we require all drafts to be perfect? No such user (talk) 09:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing, No such user, and Lauraachilders:, Double grazing, I see what you are getting at now, although stitching together facts from different parts of a text is harder to evaluate than just copying a block of text. Nevertheless, if you wish to revert my G12 decline, that's fine with me, and it will ensure that a different admin makes the call one way or another Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That certainly does not satisfy G12 criterion where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving. Only if the history is unsalvageably corrupted should it be deleted in its entirety;. No such user (talk) 09:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've no need to dispute this, @Jimfbleak, I'll just scurry along. :)

And @No such user: no, we don't "require all drafts to be perfect", far from it, but we do need to check them for some basic issues, and copyvio is one of them. Or if you know better, please do enlighten me. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One certainly should check for copyvios. But when you find only two sentences carelessly copied (and not even in its entirety), taking a gentle word with the author would be much preferred to tagging the entire article with G12 and leaving a scarying template on their talk page. That's how we chase away new editors for good. No such user (talk) 09:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a new user I must admit I was a little scared! But I have since attempted to improve this through copy edits and linking to even more sources. I have a recent fascination with this stained glass artist so it would be cool to see the page succeed -- totally receptive to further feedback! Lauraachilders (talk) 17:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@No such user @DoubleGrazing @Jimfbleak I tried to edit so as to not so closely mimic the language. Am I closer? :-) Lauraachilders (talk) 00:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lauraachilders: It's good enough for me, and I'm going to accept the article. Thank you for your work, I hope you stay around! No such user (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]