Talk:Bek Air Flight 2100

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bek Air Flight 2100 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Bek Air Flight 2100 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 December 2019.

Wikipedia

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Central Asia: Kazakhstan

	Asia portal Bek Air Flight 2100 is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kazakhstan.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image

There's an image here - [1] - that would be good for the article, however, it's from Getty Images, and therefore fails WP:Nfc. Is there any alternative that could be used, or a tag that could be put on the image? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sir Magnus (talk • contribs)

I found a useable image of the actual aircraft when serving a previous operator. Mjroots (talk) 19:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Passengers killed

It seems that all those killed were Kazakhstani and that there were only four foreigners on board, but haven't really found an unequivocal statement. The four foreigners named here do not appear on the list of 12 dead, but both these pieces still talk about "15" fatalities; Radio Free Europe is clear, but not a RS, per WP:PUS. So can better sources be found, perhaps in the local press or Government press releases? Davidships (talk) 02:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Condolence section

The condolences section was useful, even though not directly, to know which countries care about which. It was not politics (the messages were not supposed to be in the article, just the names of countries or entities who cared).

Will leave it to your judgement. 69.165.208.6 (talk) 03:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to see it gone. It's not about "caring", it's just diplomatic bumf. WWGB (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Countries" don't care, people (which may include leaders) do. Everything else is politics. Not encyclopaedic content. Davidships (talk) 10:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not needed, it is routine diplomacy for everyone to send condolences. --Hippeus (talk) 12:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A building with two floors, levels etc

The continued reverting of "story" for "storey" and vice versus is tedious (often with a unilateral claim of correctness). Both are correct - it just depends on whether the article is to be in British or American English. Is there any point in story or storey if nobody looks it up? The word was first introduced here as "storey", so unless there is other text that has established a different EngVar, MOS:RETAIN applies and Template:Uw-lang can be deployed as necessary. Davidships (talk) 23:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, but I doubt that those inclined to change to "story" will check here first. WWGB (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Indeed you are right, but at least those who are signed in can be advised directly by Template:Uw-lang on their talk pages. Davidships (talk) 02:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the area

impacting a two-storey building in a residential area

the area was not a residential, the building was illegal https://iz.ru/964809/2020-01-16/dom-s-kotorym-stolknulsia-samolet-pod-alma-atoi-byl-postroen-nezakonno 82.200.143.211 (talk) 06:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've attempted to rewrite the section in proper English. I would appreciate it if someone familiar with the Kazakh language would check my work, as I was relying on the translation tool in my web browser. Carguychris (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The iz.ru site appears to be written in Russian. Google Translate's "detect language" feature detects Russian. WhisperToMe (talk) 13:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Google Translate wasn't cooperating with me at the time. In any case, I think this page needs an update by someone who understands the Russian language, as I absolutely don't trust Google Translate on technical documents. (My son and I translated excerpts from an automotive service manual into German and back a few years ago for fun, and the results were alternately nonsensical and hilarious.) Carguychris (talk) 17:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tattile

I think tattile in "the tattile inspections on the leading edges of the wings" is a typo, but for what? Tactile? Ϣere SpielChequers 20:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]