Text and/or other creative content from this version of Beirut I (1960) was copied or moved into Beirut I with this edit on 05:48, 9 May 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Beirut I (2009) was copied or moved into Beirut I with this edit on 20:42, 17 May 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Beirut I was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
March 4, 2015: Did you know ... that the electoral district Beirut I had the largest concentration of Jewish voters in Lebanon?
February 27, 2015: Did you know ... that when the Beirut I electoral district was formed in 2008, it was the first Christian-majority electoral district in the city since 1972?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
I've decided to quickfail this review as the article is a long way from meeting the broadness criteria and the well written criteria. The sections do no flow well from one to the other, making for bad writing. Moreover, the article suffers from recentism. Some of my concerns are listed below.
Lead says "quartiers (neighbourhoods)", but the body says "neighbourhoods (quartiers)". There is an inconsistency as to which is in brackets. Steelkamp (talk) 16:14, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see that the article is formed from a merger of two other articles, and this has caused a problem with the article's structure. The 1960–1972 and 2009 sections begin with very similar sentences. The 2009 sentence does not flow well from the rest of the article before it. I think this needs rework. Steelkamp (talk) 13:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The sectioning of the article needs to be reworked as well. Why is 1960–1972 in one section, but 2009, 2018 and 2022 in separate sections. It seems like recentism to me. Steelkamp (talk) 13:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
After the Civil War, a new set-up of constituencies was used ahead of the 1992 general election abolishing the 1960 Election Law constituencies. It could be specifically stated that Beirut I was abolished. Steelkamp (talk) 13:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article suffers from recentism. For the 2009 and onwards elections, the article shows the tally received by each winner. That is not the case for the earlier elections. Steelkamp (talk) 16:14, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well written
Verifiable with no original research