Talk:Bedford Park, London

Bedford Park, London has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 4, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Contradiction

"First garden suburb". Brentham Garden Suburb also claims this. MRSC • Talk 16:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Bedford Park was largely complete by 1897, before Brentham was begun. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:42, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Parsons

The source provided seems to say he lived there only in 1910 "(Presumed)". Are there any better sources? One year doesn't sound very long? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Focus of Bedford Park Garden Suburb.svg

There seems to be an issue displaying this image in the media viewer. The error message said "Error: could not load image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Focus_of_Bedford_Park_Garden_Suburb.svg". The image looks fine when reading the article. Liam2520 (talk) 06:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Strangely, for me it did load momentarily - it showed in the media viewer for a fraction of a second - but then it was replaced by the error message (which I've never seen before on any other file). One for the technical people presumably? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 06:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. It loaded momentarily for me too. Liam2520 (talk) 08:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Something odd. How do we ask the techs? Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All I can think of is WP:HELPDESK or WP:TECHPUMP, but I'm not sure that's the right spot. Liam2520 (talk) 09:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bedford Park, London/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Liam2520 (talk · contribs) 12:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this good article nomination.

Many thanks for taking this on. I'll be out of office for some days from Friday so there could be some delay in completing my replies. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Observations

I am generally happy with this well-written article, but there are two points I would like to clarify.

Fashion

Section 2.1, Last Paragraph. "By 1888, the area's fashionability was declining"... [Quote from The Woman's World]. Does that statement sound too strong on the basis of just one quote? I don't think the area's "decline" is mentioned anywhere else in the article. Is there any other proof that by 1888, the area's fashionability was declining? If not, see if the paragraph can be re-worded to inform the reader that the area's fashionability was declining just according to Miss M. Nicolle and The Woman's World, edited by Wilde. I just find the claim too strong otherwise.

Reworded to make the attribution clear. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Significance

Section 2.2, Last Paragraph. Can The Sporting and Dramatic News be wikilinked to Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News? Are they different things? Ian Fletcher in his book you cited called it "The Sporting and Dramatic News", but they sound too similar to be different.

Liam2520 (talk) 14:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they're surely the same. The word "Illustrated" is printed in much smaller type on the cover. Linked. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pass

I believe this article to satisfy all of the good article criteria.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Article followed the MoS, and I did not find any grammatical issues.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
References are accurate and reliable. No plagiarism or original research found.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Article is broad and focused. Linked to separate article for architecture.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
The article followed a neutral point of view, and the facts are verifiable with reliable sources provided.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
All good here.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The File:Focus of Bedford Park Garden Suburb.svg(now .png) issue has been fixed, so all good. A very minor issue, but to me the two images in the architecture section look a bit small.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Well done. This article has been a delight to read and review. Liam2520 (talk) 16:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]