Talk:Bauhaus University, Weimar
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
File:Hauptgebaeude.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Hauptgebaeude.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 5 September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
File:Library Bauhaus-University Weimar.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Library Bauhaus-University Weimar.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 5 September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
Subjective/marketing-like assertions about faculties
[edit]In the section on the faculties has some marketing-like claims like "…an interdisciplinary approach in the best Bauhaus tradition—by interweaving science and technology. …". --Simulo (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Continuity with the original Bauhaus Weimar
[edit]This article presents the history of the original Bauhaus Weimar as the history of the present Bauhaus-Universität, claiming continuity without properly addressing the "political reasons" that mark the stark institutional and intellectual break post-Gropius, and without really acknowledging the legacy of the Bauhaus Dessau. This is of course how the University wishes to paint its public image, but I believe that the discussion of its pre-1925 history is irrelevant and better covered on Bauhaus.