Talk:Battle of the Cedars/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review of this version:
Pn = paragraph n • Sn = sentence n

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • Prelude, P1, S1 (the only one): I split this into two sentences
   • I also made a few other minor copyedits for punctuation, etc.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Other than the minor items that I fixed (listed above), I could find nothing lacking in this article, so I am passing it. Great job! — Bellhalla (talk) 02:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Magic♪piano 03:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)