Talk:Battle of the Cedars

Battle of the Cedars is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Battle of the Cedars is part of the Canadian campaign of 1775 series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 8, 2018.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 4, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
July 1, 2009	Good topic candidate	Promoted
April 7, 2010	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
April 30, 2010	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 19, 2013, May 19, 2016, May 19, 2020, and May 19, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

Military history: British / Canadian / European / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Quebec / History / Military Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada.
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian military and military history task force

Montreal Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Empire Low‑importance

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Force Strength

According to the box describing the battle, there were no more than 200 on the British/Native side, but in the text, the force strength is listed as 650. Which is right?Dave 06:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality

There is a couple of problems connected to this article: 1. Its difficult to read. Some sentences is not complete and its all written in one paragraf. 2. Its not about the battle. Its about what happened to the soldiers after the battle. Shauni 21:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Battle of Vaudreuil

Discuss "merger" of Battle of Vaudreuil stub here.

The Vaudreuil article is currently a nearly-empty stub. Establishing context to explain the action in a separate article (see the section on the skirmish in this article) would require largely replicating this article. Magic♪piano 21:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since there was such strong feeling, I went ahead and "merged" (replaced Vaudreuil article with redirect here). Magic♪piano 17:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of the Cedars/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review of this version:
Pn = paragraph n • Sn = sentence n

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Prelude, P1, S1 (the only one): I split this into two sentences

I also made a few other minor copyedits for punctuation, etc.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Other than the minor items that I fixed (listed above), I could find nothing lacking in this article, so I am passing it. Great job! — Bellhalla (talk) 02:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Magic♪piano 03:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flag

Given that you have used the correctly dated flags for Great Britain and the United Colonies, it seems a bit anachronistic to use an Iroquois flag from the 1980s in this article. If the Iroquois used a single flag at the time then that should be used, if not then you shouldn't use any flag at all for them.--Jackyd101 (talk) 02:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not conversant in the history of the Iroquois banner. If in fact this use is anachronistic, it is hardly alone in WP, as it is is used in quite a few Revolutionary War (and earlier) articles. (I have no objection to altering this condition, just noting that it exists.) Magic♪piano 03:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The banner is a modern construct and as such is anchronistic. I would recommend removing it from this page and any others that predate its development.--Jackyd101 (talk) 14:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I estimate that 20-30 of the flag 80 or so usages of the flag may be at issue. I'll certainly remove it from articles I work on. Magic♪piano 15:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quinze Chiens name

I don't know how to enter info correctly here without messing up someone's work, but I have a comment. I was told and have seen in records that the place called Quinze Chiens is a francization of the native american word Quenechoen. Andielemmer (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Andielemmer[reply]

What sort of records did you see? If it's published in some sort of book or scholarly publication, we could definitely use it. Magic♪piano 14:42, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]