Talk:Battle of Uji (1180)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Uji (1180) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Japan: Military history High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 10:00, November 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Military history: Asian / Japanese / Medieval Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Hagiography

Seems to contain a hagiography of one of the participants in the battle, labeling them a "hero"Frobird (talk) 14:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I re-wrote the part in question as well as fixed some grammar and sentence structuring among other things. I'm confident that I re-wrote it enough to fit the criteria to remove the annotation warning of a non-neutral opinion in the article, so I did. MeadeIndeed (talk) 18:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review of my Revamp

Sorry to bother you, @Utopes (I don't know any other reviewer and I think you're quite a good one), but I've revamped this page entirely to try and make it as good as possible, and I was wondering if you could possibly review it and see if it could get a higher rating on the content assessment scale? Correcting or pointing out mistakes would also be appreciated. Thank you, BeamLSB (talk) 22:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BeamLSB:; thanks for the ping! This article, as written, is a C class for sure. When it comes to the early stages of WP:Article assessment, (i.e. stubs, start-class, and c-class articles), the primary distinguisher tends to be the length of the articles and references section. You've added a lot of depth to the article (quadrupled its size!!), and I can confidently say the article is at C-class as a minimum.

B-class has a set of criteria, which differ depending on the project. The general criteria for a B-class article is written at WP:BCLASS, but WikiProjects might have different criteria on a case-by-case basis; you can ask the folks over at WT:MILHIST for questions about military-history article rating.

Above B-class are the elusive WP:Good articles and WP:Featured articles. Each of these assessments will require a lot of commitment from one particular editor to one particular article of interest. Honestly, I think you'd totally be able to write a good article, if you have a topic in mind with extensive reliable sources. You'd have to pick an article to nominate at WP:GAN (Good Article Nominations), but you'd need to make sure it meets the good article criteria first.

That all being said, this article is definitely at a C-class for now. The only rating that this can possibly be promoted to (without going through the GA nomination process), is to B-class, and the B-class assessment for this subject-matter is usually handled by the WP:MILHIST folks who I'd recommend getting into contact with. After B-class, the next step is GA-class, which has a case-by-case review process. Let me know if you have any other questions! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]