Talk:Battle of Milliken's Bend

Battle of Milliken's Bend has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 19, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 4, 2021.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Battle of Milliken's Bend brought acceptance of African Americans as soldiers?

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

United States: Louisiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Battle of Young's Point was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 2 March 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Battle of Milliken's Bend. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

New editor

I'm a newbie, just learning my way around. Just wanted to let folks know in case I do something wrong. I feel like I'm learning quickly, though. CWology (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Added a couple of cites to the OR's - they're not exactly pretty looking. Would appreciate if someone can instruct me and/or clean up the cite formats. The "Book" template for source citations does not lend itself very well to this source. Thanks. CWology (talk) 01:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you may want to take a look at its parameters. For example, "publisher" seems more appropriate for the "War Dept." entry than "last" - that's meant for the author's last name. Better for this purpose, however, is {{cite encyclopedia}} - that's meant for works published in multiple volumes, just like the Official Records. (By the way, "OR" usually has a completely different meaning on Wikipedia.) I've changed the template; thanks for finding some references in the first place! Huon (talk) 03:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 15:00, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Depiction of the battle in Harper's Weekly

... that the Battle of Milliken's Bend (pictured) brought acceptance of African Americans as soldiers? [1]

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Wilfrid T. F. Castle
Comment: I'm open to alternate phrasings.

Improved to Good Article status by Hog Farm (talk). Self-nominated at 18:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - ?
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Informative and concise Civil War fact! "The soldiers at Milliken's Bend had no prior experience with firearms before joining the Union Army, and demonstrated very poor marksmanship during training. Colonel Hermann Lieb commanded the camp, which was manned by an infantry brigade of African Americans soldiers and some cavalry from Illinois." appears to be missing a citation (unless the intended citation is Miller, which is separated by a paragraph break and may need to be repeated for good measure). Accepting offline sources in good faith. GeneralPoxter (talk) 21:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralPoxter: - Yes, it was suppose to be Miller - a copy editor split the paragraph and evidently didn't realize they broke a reference away from its text. I've added the reference back to where it was. Hog Farm _Talk 21:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All right, good to go now! GeneralPoxter (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]