Talk:Battle of Jaji

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Jaji article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Afghanistan Mid‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East / Russian & Soviet / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Soviet Union Mid‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This seems to suggest that it was the Mujahideen who were forced to pull back, is it just a case of poor grammar? Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 06:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is just a more objective and recent source.

I traced this information back to a Palestinian journalist who had contacts with bin Laden. [1] [2]

-YMB29 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Jaji. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071127011223/http://leav-www.army.mil/fmso/documents/Withdrawal.pdf to http://leav-www.army.mil/fmso/documents/Withdrawal.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.peterbergen.com/bergen/articles/details.aspx?id=235

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Potential reference for expansion

A few years ago I read/skim a part of the book, The Lofty Mountain, which has a first-hand account of the battle (bin Laden's) and has a lot of details. If someone wants to expand this page, it might be a good source. or at least I mention this source here, as I probably should not list it as a reference because it's not used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PointyPenBoy (talk • contribs) 18:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Afghan mujahideen

The Afghan mujahideen needs to stay in the infobox as their involvement is supported by the article body and corroborated by multiple reliable sources Fanatizka (talk) 09:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, especially since they probably performed most of the fighting as they lost way more men.

Hegghammer, Thomas (2020). The Caravan: Abdallah Azzam and the Rise of Global Jihad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 347. doi:10.1017/9781139049375. ISBN 978-0-521-76595-4.

The jihadis displayed real courage, but they were also lucky. At one point there were only nine defenders left, but the Russians did not realize, and failed to take advantage of the situation before the reinforcements arrived. Besides, the Arabs, who numbered about eighty in the battle as a whole, were supported by a substantial Afghan force. This was reflected in the casualty figures; the Arabs lost thirteen or fourteen men while Sayyaf’s men lost around seventy. Still, it was a landmark achievement for the Arabs, who until then had not made much of a mark on the battlefield.

--Jo1971 (talk) 18:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's also worth noting that the reason why most accounts of this battle focus primarily on the Arab participation is largely owed to the fact that the Arabs were the only ones who considered it important. Most authoritative accounts of the Soviet-Afghan war do not even acknowledge this as a regular battle, but simply consider it a minor skirmish in an offensive that the Soviets had launched in Paktia to relieve a besieged garrison. Capturing the caves was not actually the Soviet objective. The Afghan mujahideen for their part were fighting a guerilla war that focused mostly on hit-and-run harassment attacks against the Soviets and was not focused on setting up and defending permanent bases in conventional warfare fashion. The Afghans even had to force the Arabs to retreat at multiple points because their insistence on holding on to undefendable terrain was undercutting their strategy. And for all the Jihadi propaganda about the "remarkable Arab victory at Jaji," there's actually no real accounts from reliable sources stating that the Soviets suffered any casualties at all during this battle. It was a propaganda victory much more so than a military one. Fanatizka (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]